Implicating presenting_anus → presenting
Link to implication

Reason:

Also:

• Implication: presenting_anus -> anus

I can't think of any reason why this is a bad implication. +1

Do we need both presenting_hindquarters and presenting_anus? Seems redundant to me, both are for the same type of presenting.

Genjar said:
Do we need both presenting_hindquarters and presenting_anus? Seems redundant to me, both are for the same type of presenting.

You can definitely be presenting your hindquarters without presenting your anus. Seems like it would be a particularly useful tag when it's implying the character really wants anal sex in particular (think spread_anus).

The utility of it though? Not so sure.

This seems like a cleaning projevy in waiting. at first glance through a page or two, well over three quarters could be tagged with just presenting_hindquarters and no one would bat an eyelash (although there ARE some clear presenting_anus).

-1. This is confusing and will only cause misstagging. I'd just alias it to "presenting_hindquarters".

Lizardite said:
-1. This is confusing and will only cause misstagging. I'd just alias it to "presenting_hindquarters".

Well, what about images where a character is lying on their back and presenting their anus? Does that count as presenting_hindquarters? I ask because I was under the impression that presenting_hindquarters meant that the character was bending over and pointing their butt toward the viewer.

Approved both.

Sometimes images end up in there when they really fit better under presenting_hindquarters, this is true. But there's still quite a few images where the presenting isn't as clearly presenting_hindquarters (which is about presenting the butt). Sometimes the butt is there but actually de-emphasized because of position or because they're more pointedly presenting their holes. In those cases, presenting_hindquarters doesn't really fit as well but tags like presenting_pussy or presenting_anus describe what's happening a lot better. It's just about where the presenting emphasis is placed. So even if it may need some cleaning, I think it does have a purpose to keep it for. Also worth noting, that there's some images which end up under presenting_hindquarters but would actually fit one of these other tags better. So a tag project might be good, but would probably need to include both tags to truly straighten it all out.

Then shouldn't it at least be implicated to presenting_hindquarters, instead of directly to presenting? Because I don't see how it's possible to present anus without presenting the rear.

Genjar said:
Then shouldn't it at least be implicated to presenting_hindquarters, instead of directly to presenting? Because I don't see how it's possible to present anus without presenting the rear.

This isn't exactly presenting, but in a slightly different pose I could see it being tagged with one but not the other:

post #474062

Those puffy anuses might make this a bit tricky.

Genjar said:
Then shouldn't it at least be implicated to presenting_hindquarters, instead of directly to presenting? Because I don't see how it's possible to present anus without presenting the rear.

Mainly what stands in the way of implicating presenting_anus to --> presenting_hindquarters is whether or not images like: post #511146 post #540271 post #574295 post #407086 count as "presenting_hindquarters"?

Or if presenting_hindquarters requires there to be more emphasis on the butt itself, like:
post #535983 post #520792 post #492898 post #580901 post #580227

From my understanding, this is also the main reason why presenting_pussy hasn't been implicated to --> presenting_hindquarters either. Because when a character is seen from a bent over position, images will probably fit both tags more often than not. But if seen from a spread legs position, presenting_hindquarters doesn't seem to fit except in a general sense. It's not nearly as clear whether or not it should be tagged with hindquarters. Images which fall into this sort of grey zone often end up tagged with only the umbrella presenting tag because a lot of people see presenting_hindquarters as being more butt-centric than those are. Though some still get tagged with both.

Implicating them would make presenting_hindquarters an umbrella tag for both groin and butt. I'm not sure that would be as helpful. Because they overlap so often, I can understand wishing they could be implicated, I'm just not sure it would always work. At the very least it would be good to discuss it. The implication can always be moved if need be.