The bulk update request #3402 is active.

Reason: New characters should imply them's_fightin'_Herds; Fred should have an alias easier to remember; and the species is not the surname for Arizona, Velvet, and Paprika, and never were.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3402 (forum #347128) has failed: Error: Antecedent tag must not be aliased to another tag (create implication stronghoof_hoofstrong_(tfh) -> them's_fightin'_herds)

EDIT: The bulk update request #3402 (forum #347128) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

pikarobo said:
the game itself should imply video_games

Characters from the game can be depicted in a way that doesn't look like a video game, so that implication should be removed.

watsit said:
Characters from the game can be depicted in a way that doesn't look like a video game, so that implication should be removed.

Fair. I removed that one.

wait, why change the character tags to not use full names?

darryus said:
wait, why change the character tags to not use full names?

Because "Arizona Cow", "Velvet Reindeer", and "Paprika Papa" are not the names of Arizona, Velvet, and Paprika; as far as I can look into it, they were never called that and all go by one name.

Velvet's full name might be Velvet Hoofstrong, but I don't think that's 100% confirmed.

pikarobo said:
Because "Arizona Cow", "Velvet Reindeer", and "Paprika Papa" are not the names of Arizona, Velvet, and Paprika; as far as I can look into it, they were never called that and all go by one name.

Velvet's full name might be Velvet Hoofstrong, but I don't think that's 100% confirmed.

oh yeah, okay, that makes sense, then.

pikarobo said:
Because "Arizona Cow", "Velvet Reindeer", and "Paprika Papa" are not the names of Arizona, Velvet, and Paprika; as far as I can look into it, they were never called that and all go by one name.

Velvet's full name might be Velvet Hoofstrong, but I don't think that's 100% confirmed.

I would still alias the old names, instead of mass updating.
People have been using these tags, after all.

bitwolfy said:
I would still alias the old names, instead of mass updating.
People have been using these tags, after all.

I thought that would make an alias automatically. Regardless, I'll add those too.

pikarobo said:
I thought that would make an alias automatically. Regardless, I'll add those too.

I don't think the BUR will let you, since those tags have aliases and implications of their own.
ex. an existing alias velvet_reindeer -> velvet_reindeer_(tfh) won't let you request a velvet_reindeer_(tfh) -> velvet_(tfh) in the BUR.
I kind of assumed that you requested a mass update to bypass this restriction.

I'll need to fix it manually. Assuming that there are no objections to it, of course.

So should I change it back to the way it was?

pikarobo said:
So should I change it back to the way it was?

No, don't worry about it. It's fine.

Alright.
I actually planned to make wiki pages for most of the game's characters, since no one else did it yet, which I can't really do until the tags are updated.
Never did a BUR before but I can imagine you guys have a lot to do, so take your time deciding.

Good BUR, but I'd argue that the _(tfh) at the end of Stronghoof's tag is unnecessary.

jockjamdoorslam said:
Good BUR, but I'd argue that the _(tfh) at the end of Stronghoof's tag is unnecessary.

I reversed it, just in case.

One more question, If I do start making the character wiki pages early, would the wikiname automatically be changed with the new tags? I plan to have them link to eachother and TFH related tags, but I don't want to use the "wrong" names.

A couple more for the bulk update, since there's no more room.

create implication Cupid_(tfh) -> them's_fightin'_herds
create implication Vetr_(tfh) -> them's_fightin'_herds
create implication Nidra_(tfh) -> them's_fightin'_herds

And as another older thread said:
create alias velvet_(tfh) -> velvet_hoofstrongdottr_(tfh)
create alias velvet_reindeer_(tfh) -> velvet_hoofstrongdottr_(tfh)

The bulk update request #3402 (forum #347128) has failed: Error: Antecedent tag must not be aliased to another tag (create implication stronghoof_hoofstrong_(tfh) -> them's_fightin'_herds)

The bulk update request #3402 (forum #347128) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #7189 is active.

create implication stronghoof_hoofstrong (50) -> them's_fightin'_herds (2650)
create implication cupid_(tfh) (2) -> them's_fightin'_herds (2650)
create implication vetr_(tfh) (3) -> them's_fightin'_herds (2650)
create implication nidra_(tfh) (29) -> them's_fightin'_herds (2650)

Reason: Failed implication correction

Opinions on
velvet_(tfh)
velvet_reindeer
velvet_reindeer_(tfh)
velvet_hoofstrongdottr_(tfh)
velvet_hoofstrongdottr
velvet_hoofstrong
?
It's kinda a mess of aliases and implications. Which should be the main tag?

EDIT: The bulk update request #7189 (forum #396753) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #7189 (forum #396753) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.