Implicating spitroast → double_penetration
Link to implication

Reason:

Spitroasting is a type of double penetration

According to current double_penetration wiki there are cases when spitroast should be tagged, but double_penetration shouldn't. All threesome spitroasts, for example.

wat

titanmelon said:
wat

Images or animations depicting

a female character who is being both vaginally penetrated and anally penetrated at the same time.

a female character vaginally penetrated or anally penetrated with 2 penis, 2 tails, 2 objects or a combination of the all three.

a male character anally penetrated with 2 penises, 2 tails, 2 objects or a combination of the all three.

Only anal and vaginal penetrations count. Oral penetration doesn't count. Therefore spitroast with 1 vaginal and 1 oral penetration is not double_penetration.

Technically this would be accurate, but we don't consider oral to be penetration by my understanding.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
Only anal and vaginal penetrations count. Oral penetration doesn't count. Therefore spitroast with 1 vaginal and 1 oral penetration is not double_penetration.

Durandal said:
Technically this would be accurate, but we don't consider oral to be penetration by my understanding.

That's...kind of dumb

But ok
-
What about implicating spitroast to multiple penetration instead?

titanmelon said:
That's...kind of dumb

But ok
-
What about implicating spitroast to multiple penetration instead?

I think that it wouldn't really do much to help people find what they're looking for, and that's what really matters...

Durandal said:
I think that it wouldn't really do much to help people find what they're looking for, and that's what really matters...

Exactly

There are lots of posts with neither tag, and implicating one to the other alleviates that, so there's a higher chance of finding it

Also, it helps prevent things like this from happening

Genjar said:
Most of those were uploaded and tagged by the same user.
I don't see anyone else tagging it contrary to the wiki, so this seems like an another case of single user mistagging something by hundreds. That happens pretty often.

(If I sound bitter about it, it's because I've spent most of the year cleaning after one such user. And am not even halfway done.)

I would like to think that people on this site have more important things to do (like view furry smut) than go through posts multiple times to ensure a couple tags are present each time something new comes up

Ahem.

<formeradminvoice>

The wiki can be changed. Ignore what the wiki says for the sake of tag policy discussion. Holy crap people, it's like we have no common sense around here.

</formeradminvoice>

null0010 said:
Ahem.

<formeradminvoice>

The wiki can be changed. Ignore what the wiki says for the sake of tag policy discussion. Holy crap people, it's like we have no common sense around here.

</formeradminvoice>

Yes wiki can be changed but should it be? My common sense tells me that double penetration should be tagged as it is said in the wiki. Since many users, including
titanmelon, edited this particular entry in the past I guess that some other people might also use double_penetration in this way.

Spitroast should be double penetration. o.O I don't see why not. if you're that deep down their throat that you're face fucking them, that should damn well qualify as oral penetration. >_>;

123easy said:
if you're that deep down their throat that you're face fucking them, that should damn well qualify as oral penetration. >_>;

Certainly, but the problem with this implication is that spitroast is not limited to double penetration. It could be triple penetration, especially if there's multi_penis involved.

See forum #140988 for a current response

Denied for the reasons already listed.