The tag implication #47365 leaked_pre-release_pokemon -> leaked_contents has been rejected.
Reason: To make a new tag leaked_contents and make its meaning "unreleased content discovered through unauthorized means and/or before official info".
Here is the previous conversation between me and @Watsit:
(Already Rejected) Tag implication: leaked_pokemon -> spoiler
~~~~~~~~~
While every tag requires some objective and determining threshold, the "spoiler" threshold could depend on each person.
But everything discovered illegally is still a leak.
Thus, I believe making a leaked_contents tag is appropriate.
And the standard for it would be as follows:
"All contents that cannot be discovered, by those who are gathering info as fast as they can legally viewing official info, and without through any unauthorized ways".
(( Please respond if you have a better way to say it ))
Once either "official pre-release info" or "game releases in any country" has been done, the earlier of them will be the threshold.
And the contents will no longer be "leaked_contents" at that point and then the tag should be removed immediately.
~~~~~~~~~
Of course, the content violates the Posting Unreleased Content rule,
But while in case it cannot be removed immediately, Users can avoid the disadvantage themselves by using their Blacklist.
~~~~~~~~~
Note that the tag spoiler will require disambiguation.
EDIT: The tag implication leaked_pokemon -> leaked_contents (forum #349302) has been rejected by @Kurogi_FoxSIV.
Updated by auto moderator