Updated by furrypickle
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Updated by furrypickle
I actually brought this up before in forum #145352 and it was decided that it was a bad implication.
tldr: The balls can be entirely in the mouth but not actually visible. It's the same reasoning as to why felatio doesn't imply penis.
Updated by anonymous
Yeah... this would be the same thing as ballbusting -> balls. It would need to be visible to do so.
Updated by anonymous
Yeah, for reasons already mentioned, implication is denied.
Updated by anonymous