The tag implication #47484 child_on_child -> child has been rejected.

Reason: Can't have a child on child without there being a child (or two).

EDIT: The tag implication child_on_child -> child (forum #350970) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The tag implication child_on_child -> child (forum #350970) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Since we are in this topic:

The bulk update request #3924 has been rejected.

create implication adult_on_baby (678) -> baby (5094)
create implication adult_on_baby (678) -> adult_on_young (11178)
create implication adult_on_teenager (9) -> teenager (9)
create implication adult_on_teenager (9) -> adult_on_young (11178)
create implication adult_on_young (11178) -> age_difference (63892)
create implication teenager_on_teenager (4) -> young_on_young (8520)
create implication teenager_on_child (3) -> teenager (9)
create implication teenager_on_child (3) -> child (26082)
create implication teenager_on_child (3) -> young_on_young (8520)
create implication teenager_on_child (3) -> age_difference (63892)

• > create implication teenager_on_teenager -> teenager # duplicate of implication #43604

Edit: As per forum #354766 | Removed redundant implications adult_on_baby -> age_difference and adult_on_teenager -> age_difference. They both imply adult_on_young, which in turn, will imply age_difference.

implicate adult_on_baby -> baby
implicate adult_on_baby -> adult_on_young

implicate adult_on_teenager -> teenager
implicate adult_on_teenager -> adult_on_young

implicate adult_on_young -> age_difference

implicate teenager_on_teenager -> young_on_young

implicate teenager_on_child -> teenager
implicate teenager_on_child -> child

implicate teenager_on_child -> young_on_young
implicate teenager_on_child -> age_difference

EDIT: The bulk update request #3924 (forum #354763) has been rejected by @slyroon.

m3g4p0n1 said:
create implication adult_on_baby (40) -> adult_on_young (199)
create implication adult_on_baby (40) -> age_difference (47698)

create implication adult_on_teenager (183) -> adult_on_young (199)
create implication adult_on_teenager (183) -> age_difference (47698)

It would be better to have adult_on_young imply age_difference, then these two don't need to.

watsit said:
It would be better to have adult_on_young imply age_difference, then these two don't need to.

Done, thank you for pointing that out!

The bulk update request #3924 (forum #354763) has been rejected by @slyroon.