Removing current aliases and implications, so I can alias them to a disambiguation tag.
I will try to work on specifying better tags on their respective wikis.
Edit 1: Reworking BUR as per a discord conversation that changed my opinion on the topic.
Do not approve yet.

Edit 2: BUR Rework done, unaliasing above tags so we can properly change the following ones in Part 2.

As per a discord converstation to be quoted in later posts, aliasing cub_domination and young_domination to dominant_cub and dominant_young might give enough psychological change to users once they see the alias, that they will think about using either dominant_young, or submissive_young in a proper way.

It was said that it's easier than setting up a disambiguation tag.

alias young_dom_older_sub -> younger_dom_older_sub
imply younger_dom_older_sub -> age_difference
imply older_dom_younger_sub -> age_difference

alias cub_domination -> dominant_cub
alias cubdom -> dominant_cub
alias cub_dom -> dominant_cub
alias cub_dom_small_sub -> dominant_cub

alias young_domination -> dominant_young
alias younger_dom -> dominant_young
alias youngdom -> dominant_young


imply dominant_cub -> cub
imply dominant_cub -> dominant_young
imply dominant_young -> young

imply submissive_cub -> cub
imply submissive_cub -> submissive_young
imply submisive_young -> young

imply cub_dominating_cub -> dominant_cub
imply cub_dominating_cub -> submissive_cub
imply cub_dominating_cub -> young_dominating_young

imply young_dominating_young -> dominant_young
imply young_dominating_young -> submissive_young
imply young_dominating_young -> young_on_young

Since we are on this topic, I'd like to request this alias removal. Cub_on_cub shouldn't be aliased to cub, the same way young_on_young isn't aliased to young.
I believe there are ways to search cub_on_cub content with proper tag search, but I can't think of one at the moment, and I don't see why cub_on_cub would be hurtful, it could just imply cub instead =/

Currently, there must be differente tags for young and cub stuff. Because young means both cub and nont_furry, while cub is only furry.
a cub could be on another cub(cub_on_cub), but a cub could be on another non_furry species(cub_on_young).

Of course, I could simply search young_on_young -not_furry -not_furry_focus -human, but I still feel having a cub_on_cub tag would be much simpler.

m3g4p0n1 — 18:06
 >I made a wiki for cub_domination_(disambiguation) and young_domination_(disambiguation), and created some tags in there that I believe could be useful too, feedback on the formatting would be welcome.

TheVileOne — 18:06
 >Why do we need disambiguation pages for young_domination? Every other domination tag just gets aliased to dominant_x 

m3g4p0n1 — 18:07
 >young domination could either mean dominant_young or submissive_young, which is ambiguous.
 >I wasn't aware that's how it was done to other dominant tags, but I think it's better this way, as long as someone is willing to disambiguate them.

TheVileOne — 18:08
 >So could every other domination tag that got aliased. It is why they got aliased. 

m3g4p0n1 — 18:12
 >Fair, but isn't it capable of causing mistags, for instace: posts with a male being dominated, but it's tagged with dominant_male because of this alias.

 >Sure, fixing mistags ocassionaly caused by an alias is also a relatively easy job. But having a disambiguation tag seems more organized than mixing things up on a already valid tag. Specially since it isn't guaranteed someone will keep giving a look in these tag projects.
 >Specially taking into account that, as time passes, more and more images of every content will exist, which will make backwards fixing more bothersome. 
Having a "disambiguation folder" just feels better for future proofing

TheVileOne — 18:13
 >Ultimately it will add more work than just having to correct some mistags.
 >There needs to be people willing to clean out the disambiguation, and there will be more content in the disambiguation tag than there will be mistags.

m3g4p0n1 — 18:15
 >Fair, but there is still a chance there will be more mistags than there would be tags to disambiguate.

 >For example, who would be willing to go through 35k images of dominant_male to see which one was mistagged?
 >We could rely on casual users fixing those, but it doesn't seem like a good way to go over it

TheVileOne — 18:16
 >The question becomes do we have to. If it becomes problematic just to find the mistags, then they can't be doing much harm in the tag.

m3g4p0n1 — 18:19
 >I'm not taking into account wether a tag is problematic to find or not, I'm just thinking logically, organization wise. Cub and you domination are just niche tags that are nice to have.

 >I don't know how to properly argue on my stand of keeping the disambiguation tag, I just feel that having a tag to disambiguate is always better than having a mistag among many other tags.
 >Just like bad uploaders with their copypasted tags, I believe that "Lacking tags is better than wrong tags"

TheVileOne — 18:20
 >We were trying to stray away from disambiguation tags in general unless absolutely necessary. I haven't seen a slowdown in people trying to add new disambiguations though.

DubsTheFox — 18:20
 >disambiguation tags shouldn't be used at all

m3g4p0n1 — 18:21
 >I wasn't aware of it, I thought disambiguation tags where a great tool for organizating the archive

DubsTheFox — 18:21
 >all disambiguation should be in in the invalid category. They are just not all in it, yet.

m3g4p0n1 — 18:22
 >the moment i created the disambiguation tag it already got changed into the invalid category though.

TheVileOne — 18:22
 >We're discussing creating new disambiguations, not using disambiguations.
 
m3g4p0n1 — 18:22
 >Did you mean aliasing them to invalid_tag?

cat kitty cat cat kitty cat cat — 18:23
https://e621.net/tag_type_versions?search%5Btag%5D=cub_domination_%28disambiguation%29

DubsTheFox — 18:23
 >ah. Didn't read. Just saw "using disambiguation tags can be ok" :dogkek:

m3g4p0n1 — 18:23
 >Yeah, we're talking about wether it's best to create/use the already created youngdomination(disambiguation), or alias young_domination to dominant_young, which could cause future mistags :p

TheVileOne — 18:23
 >I feel that having a disambiguation for every x_domination tag would be excessive.

m3g4p0n1 — 18:23
(replying to 'cat kitty cat cat kitty cat cat')
 >By the way, thank you for being quick on it! ^^

m3g4p0n1 — 18:24
 >Oh no, not every domination tag, no, at least not at the same time.
 >I just proposed this specific disambiguation because that's what I feel like I would be good at working at at the moment
as in, I'm willing to take this resposability of disambiguating

TheVileOne — 18:24
 >It is up there in frustrating annoyances when I want to find something quickly and I accidentally search for a disambiguated tag by mistake.

m3g4p0n1 — 18:24
 >I wouldn't want to disambiguate every ambiguous thing just for the sake of it, that'd be counter-produtive in my logical way of thinking

TheVileOne — 18:31
 >going out of our way to unalias those domination tags just for the sake of disambiguating seems unnecessary. You should probably look into if people actually are misuing the tags first. Even with the cum dom tag, are people misusing it?
 >You would be surprise how changing the name of a tag can influence behavior. It doesn't always work though as I swear some people use third part ytools or something to tag their stuff and those things don't know when something gets changed to another tag.

m3g4p0n1 — 18:35
 >Hm, as in, 
  >>someone types younger_domination, and they see the tag has been aliased to dominant_young.
  >>If they're paying some attention, they will use submissive_young instead of the aliased one

 >Is that what you mean?

TheVileOne — 18:35
 >Yes.

m3g4p0n1 — 18:35
 >Makes sense to me, it's a fairly obvious tag when you invert the words. I will change my proposed bur

m3g4p0n1 — 18:48
 >just like cub implies young, should submissive_cub imply submissive_young ?

scaliespe — 18:49
 >yes