The tag alias #61150 kakukaku_shikajika -> kakukaku_shikajika_(daihatsu_motors) has been rejected.

Reason: Describes the same character, with the latter seemingly more accepted since it has more posts tagged.

EDIT: The tag alias kakukaku_shikajika -> kakukaku_shikajika_(daihatsu_motors) (forum #356311) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

The tag alias kakukaku_shikajika -> kakukaku_shikajika_(daihatsu_motors) (forum #356311) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

Request a mass update instead please

Is there more than one Kakukaku Shikajika? If not, why not just reverse this alias?

The bulk update request #4033 is active.

mass update kakukaku_shikajika -> kakukaku_shikajika_(daihatsu_motors)

Reason:

clawstripe said:
Is there more than one Kakukaku Shikajika? If not, why not just reverse this alias?

gattonero2001, praise be, hath given us a command. What can this humble servant do, but obey? (I assume because it's simpler to review an update than an alias).

I checked the four current images with kakukaku_shikajika, and affirm that they are all the same as kakukaku_shikajika_(daihatsu_motors).

EDIT: The bulk update request #4033 (forum #356349) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #4033 (forum #356349) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

clawstripe said:
Is there more than one Kakukaku Shikajika? If not, why not just reverse this alias?

I don't like aliases from "X" to "X but with a suffix" or vice versa, regardless of whether the tag needs a suffix or not. If the suffix is necessary, it causes mistagging; otherwise, it is pointless.

If everything gets moved to A or B at once, the other tag will probably not be tagged again thanks to the autocomplete.

I don't think this one in particular needs a suffix, but it doesn't matter much if it's just an update.