Nothing too serious, just need 2nd opinions on whether these characters look like cubs to ya'll or not?

https://twitter.com/chibineco_m/status/1614613829987766273

https://twitter.com/chibineco_m/status/1616576426123362305

For context: The story is the typical "kids finds porn mag on the ground and have sex"
They seem like minors, but their design is drawn like how Chibineco usually draws his adults, kinda.

So, i'd like opinions, Do i tag these cub or not?

Doesn't strike me as cub at a quick glance, but I'd tag it has cub just to be safe.

Those don't look like minors to me

Bump.

I'm leaning on sifyro's opinion too, might just tag them young_(lore) over just cubs. but i wanna wait to hear more opinions, if possible.

They don't look like cub. Since lore-wise they are considered "kids", you can add in the young_(lore) tag instead.

Note: The tags cub/young and young_(lore) are mutually exclusive, meaning that they should not be tagged together when describing a character. Only use one of them, whichever appropriate.

so including me, that's basically 3.5 on Not cub

thegreatwolfgang said:
They don't look like cub. Since lore-wise they are considered "kids", you can add in the young_(lore) tag instead.

Note: The tags cub/young and young_(lore) are mutually exclusive, meaning that they should not be tagged together when describing a character. Only use one of them, whichever appropriate.

i misspoke, yeah i know the mutual exclusivity of those tags. i'm taggin them young_(lore).