The tag implication #50350 shark_sleeping_bag -> chumbuddy has been rejected.

Reason: Product branding

EDIT: The tag implication shark_sleeping_bag -> chumbuddy (forum #360414) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Chumbuddy does not have exclusive ownership of this concept.

If anything, shouldn't it be the other way around, or the brand being an alias for shark_sleeping_bag?

The tag implication shark_sleeping_bag -> chumbuddy (forum #360414) has been rejected by @slyroon.