Topic: [REJECTED] Tag alias: voice_actor_joke -> voice_actor_reference

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

smbsml

Privileged

The tag alias #61771 voice_actor_joke -> voice_actor_reference has been rejected.

Reason: Because it's not always jokes, right? This tag has characters dressed up another character with the same VA, not really intended as a joke but more like "isn't it neat these two characters have the same actor?" I feel like classifying the tag as a reference over a joke would be more true to its current use.

EDIT: The tag alias voice_actor_joke -> voice_actor_reference (forum #361627) has been rejected by @smbsml.

Updated by auto moderator

Watsit

Privileged

At first I thought it meant literally joking about/referencing a voice actor. Or a voice actor making a joke/reference. It's not obvious it's intended for a character cosplaying another, and that they happen to have the same voice actor in some language.

I could also see this tag being a problem in some cases where two apparently different characters having the same voice actor is a plot point of sorts, and could be considered spoilery.

Legendz spoilers

Such as Shiron and Ranshiin. Something that the show hid by not listing Ranshiin's VA in the credits until the later episodes, after it was revealed that Shiron and Ranshiin are separate aspects of one character, then would show Ranshiin's VA being the same as Shiron's.

smbsml

Privileged

Attempt to revive this with a bump?

^ I don't see that Legendz example as relevant/having the tag in the first place, and I think it still comes from a misconception about what the tag is/how it's used. Which is why it needs a rename.

  • 1