Topic: [REJECTED] The Big Bloons BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

just lurking

Member

The bulk update request #4514 has been rejected.

create implication alchemist_monkey (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication wizard_monkey (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication dart_monkey (4) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication ice_monkey_(bloons_td_6) (1) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication druid_monkey_(bloons) (8) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication ezili (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication glue_gunner (10) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication boomerang_monkey (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication admiral_brickell (122) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication gwendolin (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication sauda (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication bloonarius (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication massive_ornary_air_blimp (27) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication zeppelin_of_mighty_gargantuaness (20) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication dartling_gunner (5) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication sniper_monkey (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication patch_(bloons) (38) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication brutal_flying_behemoth (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication obyn_greenfoot (5) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication quincy_(bloons) (9) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication benjamin_(bloons) (7) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication captain_churchill (8) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication adora_(bloons) (71) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication pat_fusty (9) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication etienne (1) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)

Reason: These are all characters/towers in the bloons tower defense games. For some reason, none of their character tags implicate bloons_tower_defense so it's a bit annoying to tag any of them. There are also so many tags that I hit the limit so I need to add another BUR to this thread. It really is that big.

EDIT: The bulk update request #4514 (forum #362397) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

just lurking

Member

The bulk update request #4515 has been rejected.

create implication psi_(bloons) (1) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication big_airship_of_doom (14) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication monkey_sub_(bloons_td_6) (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication buccaneer_monkey (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication ninja_monkey (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication engineer_monkey (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication beast_handler (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication glue_rat_(bloons_tower_defense) (1) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create alias glue_gunner_rat (1) -> glue_rat_(bloons_tower_defense) (1)
create implication gravelord_lych_(bloons_td_6) (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create alias bloons (4) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication dark_dirigible_titan (11) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication cave_monkey_(btd_6) (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)

Reason: Ok I think this is it but i'll double check later. I also suggested some aliases since they're just duplicate tags. Hopefully I won't need to make another BUR.

EDIT: The bulk update request #4515 (forum #362400) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

Wandering Spaniel

Janitor

The bulk update request #4695 is active.

create alias btd6 (1) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create alias bloons (4) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
mass update alchemist_monkey -> alchemist_(bloons)
create implication alchemist_(bloons) (175) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication wizard_monkey_(bloons) (15) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
mass update dart_monkey -> dart_monkey_(bloons)
create implication dart_monkey_(bloons) (81) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create alias ice_monkey_(bloons_td_6) (1) -> ice_monkey_(bloons) (23)
create implication ice_monkey_(bloons) (23) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create alias druid_monkey_(bloons) (8) -> druid_(bloons) (235)
create implication druid_(bloons) (235) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication mortar_monkey_(bloons) (2) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication ezili_(bloons) (47) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication glue_gunner (10) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication boomerang_monkey_(bloons) (5) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication admiral_brickell (122) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication monkey_ace_(bloons) (4) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication gwendolin_(bloons) (32) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication etienne_(bloons) (15) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication super_monkey_(bloons) (1) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication sauda_(bloons) (73) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication bloonarius_the_inflator (22) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication massive_ornary_air_blimp (27) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication zeppelin_of_mighty_gargantuaness (20) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication agent_jericho (3) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)

Reason:

old stuff, ignore

Just one missed one

Also the suffixes should be standardized. I vote for BTD as the suffix since it's short and recognizable (imo). Bloons could also be a good suffix.
Here's the ones that need to be edited if we go with BTD:
alias ice_monkey_(bloons_td_6) -> ice_monkey_(btd)
alias druid_monkey_(bloons) -> druid_monkey_(btd)
alias patch_(bloons) -> patch_(btd)
alias quincy_(bloons) -> quincy_(btd)
alias benjamin_(bloons) -> benjamin_(btd)
alias adora_(bloons) -> adora_(btd)
alias psi_(bloons) -> psi_(btd)
alias monkey_sub_(bloons_td_6) -> monkey_sub_(btd)
alias glue_rat_(bloons_tower_defense) -> glue_rat_(btd)
alias glue_gunner_rat -> glue_rat_(btd)
alias cave_monkey_(btd_6) -> cave_monkey_(btd)

These ones are human first names that could potentially have conflict in the future:
update gwendolin -> gwendolin_(btd)
imply gwendolin_(btd) -> bloons_tower_defense
update etienne -> etienne_(btd)
imply etienne_(btd) -> bloons_tower_defense
update sauda -> sauda_(btd)
imply sauda_(btd) -> bloons_tower_defense

I'm not positive if some of these need suffixes though, like ice monkey and druid monkey. Or if they do need them, then others like sniper monkey, boomerang monkey, etc. might also need suffixes...
I'm at least pretty sure gravelord lych doesn't need one:
alias gravelord_lych_(bloons_td_6) -> gravelord_lych
imply gravelord_lych -> bloons_tower_defense

part 1 of fixed BUR to standardize the suffixes. I gave the *_monkeys suffixes just in case.
The druid and alchemist characters in the game actually don't have "monkey" in their names

EDIT: The bulk update request #4695 (forum #364218) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

dba afish

Member

cloudpie said:
So apparently there's a wider Bloons franchise and the Bloons Tower Defense series is only a part of that. Should bloons_tower_defense imply bloons? alias to it?

implcation would maybe be correct, but I feel like that'd kinda like be implying puyo_puyo to madou_monogatari.

Bloons TD, despite being the spinoff series, is pretty much the only thing that matters at this point, is the only part of the franchise with anything approaching unique character designs, and probably is the more recognizable brand name, implying would essentially be creating a dead tag, and I'm not sure if aliasing would be necessary either.

Wandering Spaniel

Janitor

juansanchez said:
Bloons TD, despite being the spinoff series, is pretty much the only thing that matters at this point, is the only part of the franchise with anything approaching unique character designs, and probably is the more recognizable brand name, implying would essentially be creating a dead tag, and I'm not sure if aliasing would be necessary either.

Very true. Do you think the character suffix should be _(btd) or _(bloons)?

Edit: Also there's currently a bloons tag on a few btd posts, should that be aliased to bloons_tower_defense?

dba afish

Member

cloudpie said:
Very true. Do you think the character suffix should be _(btd) or _(bloons)?

personally I'd lean towards truncating the series name into a few (or one) recognizable words rather than intialisms when possible (*_(zelda) > *_(loz), *_(sonic) > *_(sth)). so, *_(bloons) would be my pick.

cloudpie said:
Edit: Also there's currently a bloons tag on a few btd posts, should that be aliased to bloons_tower_defense?

yes? I mean, if we ever come up with a reason to have two separate tags we could probably deal with it later, but for now I don't really see that happening.

Wandering Spaniel

Janitor

The bulk update request #5793 is active.

create implication dartling_gunner (5) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
mass update sniper_monkey -> sniper_monkey_(bloons)
create implication sniper_monkey_(bloons) (41) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication patch_(bloons) (38) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication brutal_floating_behemoth (10) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication obyn_greenfoot (5) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication quincy_(bloons) (9) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication benjamin_(bloons) (7) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication captain_churchill (8) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication adora_(bloons) (71) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication pat_fusty (9) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication psi_(bloons) (1) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication big_airship_of_doom (14) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication monkey_sub_(bloons) (9) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication monkey_buccaneer_(bloons) (5) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication ninja_monkey_(bloons) (8) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication engineer_monkey_(bloons) (5) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
mass update beast_handler -> beast_handler_(bloons)
create implication beast_handler_(bloons) (7) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create alias glue_rat_(bloons_tower_defense) (1) -> glue_rat_(bloons) (1)
create alias glue_gunner_rat (1) -> glue_rat_(bloons) (1)
create implication glue_rat_(bloons) (1) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication gravelord_lych (12) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication dark_dirigible_titan (11) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)
create implication cave_monkey_(bloons) (1) -> bloons_tower_defense (983)

Reason: part 2 of my fixed version

EDIT: The bulk update request #5793 (forum #380783) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

  • 1