Implicating black_and_white → plain_background
Link to implication

Reason:

Every black and white picture has a plain background, either white or black.

Not always.

post #678686 post #677610 post #668475

Knotty_Curls said:
Not always.

post #678686 post #677610 post #668475

These are grayscale. The tagger did a mistake. look at black_and_white for more information about diffrence of grayscale & black_and_White.

Fuck I've been tagging black_and_white instead of monochrome + greyscale.

Lance_Armstrong said:
Fuck I've been tagging black_and_white instead of monochrome + greyscale.

Uh-Oh.
My current project is tagging untagged black_and_white and grayscale pictures.
I'll correct mistagged pics after it.

Implication denied. In addition to the frequent mistags, there are a lot of different things that go into black_and_white that don't have a plain background. Additionally, there are going to be some changes made to the background tags in forum #152783 which may not be very compatible with this.

That being said, black_and_white -plain_background seems like a good tagging project if someone is interested. :3