Topic: [APPROVED] Tag implication: aroused_by_another -> aroused

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

bobbertjones said:
not sure how much more useful this is than arousal tease duo but yeah sure I guess imply makes sense

This and other variations of this search can be reduced to just teasing, inviting, or presenting. I felt a tag for being affected by invitations was needed so users didn't have to rely on isolated reaction tags ([blush]], erection, etc.) or perspective tags (looking at another, solo focus). aroused is so ambiguous already, mostly treated as synonym for something under horny (disambiguation), that we could probably reverse implicate, but I don't want to suggest breaking things so I went with common sense.

  • 1