The tag alias #62156 big_penis_penetrated -> hung_bottom is pending approval.

Reason: They both describe character that has a large penis and is being penetrated.

hung_bottom is a catchier name for the tag and the more popular of the two, meanwhile big_penis_penetrated sounds a bit nonsensical and at worst could be confused for docking ie literally penises being penetrated.

Needs cleanup, in some of the tagged posts the "bottom" has no penis. It sounds like some people might tag big_penis_penetrated when they meant big_penis_penetrating.

It's been cleaned up now as far as I can tell

What should the inverse tag be called?

a_yak said:
What should the inverse tag be called?

Do you mean when the bottom has a small penis, or when the top isn't hung?

Bumping this thread because it hasn't been approved or rejected.

"Big_penis_penetrated" still exists as a tag despite fulfilling the exact same function as the more popular "hung_bottom" tag, while being grammatical nonsense and easily confused with the more popular and legitimate tag "big_penis_penetrating".

The tag "big_penis_penetrated" always imply that there is a character that is being penetrated and hence the bottom, and that the bottom is hung. Ergo it is a redundant tag as "hung_bottom" describes that there is a character that is being penetrated and hence the bottom, and that bottom is hung.