The tag alias #62276 partially_offscreen_character -> mostly_offscreen_character is pending approval.

Reason: Identical in meaning (based on tagging).

is it though? I still don't know where the lines are between disembodied_* and mostly_offscreen_character, and mostly_offscreen_character and faceless_character are. and this tag seems like it could go in any of these camps.

darryus said:
is it though? I still don't know where the lines are between disembodied_* and mostly_offscreen_character, and mostly_offscreen_character and faceless_character are. and this tag seems like it could go in any of these camps.

Speaking of which, there are a couple of posts under partially_offscreen_character that should go under faceless_character, but they can be moved manually. The main problem with this tag is, for example, I was gonna tag partially_offscreen_character instead of mostly_offscreen_character. I reckon a similar alias should be done to deal with partially_clothed and mostly_clothed.

I wouldn't call
post #3880155
a mostly offscreen character. A good portion of him is onscreen. I think the reverse may be better; a mostly offscreen character is partially offscreen, but a partially offscreen character isn't necessarily mostly offscreen.