The tag alias #62505 collar_and_leash -> leashed_collar has been approved.

Reason: Same items in a different order.

EDIT: The tag alias collar_and_leash -> leashed_collar (forum #366552) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Maybe the other way around?
It just sounds better that way, in my opinion.

I thought both of these were going to be aliased to leashed_collar - topic #31233

faucet said:
I thought both of these were going to be aliased to leashed_collar - topic #31233

I never got around to it =/

bitwolfy said:
Maybe the other way around?
It just sounds better that way, in my opinion.

hmmm, in my opinion "leash and collar" sounds better than "collar and leash", so I am OK with this implication. Plus leash_and_collar already has a wiki page.

I guess leashed_collar would be more formally correct, although leash_and_collar is clear because a leash and collar that appear unconnected in an image would be tagged leash and collar separately. I'd be OK with either of those, but depending on which one gets chosen, we should definitely alias either leashed_collar -> leash_and_collar or leash_and_collar -> leashed_collar afterwards.

I don't personally have an opinion of which is best, all of these sound good to me.

+1 for leashed_collar as it better indicates the two must be connected

The tag alias collar_and_leash -> leashed_collar (forum #366552) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #4884 has been rejected.

create implication leashed_collar (9127) -> collar (265507)

Reason: bonus implication

edit: fuck, i didn't even see this one existed

EDIT: The bulk update request #4884 (forum #366649) has been rejected by @faucet.

The bulk update request #4884 (forum #366649) has been rejected by @faucet.

OK, we now have both leash_and_collar and collar_and_leash aliased to leashed_collar. Good.

Since leash_and_collar was the only one with a wiki definition, I went ahead and moved that definition to leashed_collar.