The bulk update request #4973 is active.

create alias timon_and_pumbaa (1) -> the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14)
create implication the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14) -> the_lion_king (10748)
create alias eddie_(timon_and_pumbaa) (1) -> eddie_(timon_&_pumbaa) (0)
create alias piper_(timon_and_pumbaa) (0) -> piper_(timon_&_pumbaa) (9)
create alias ralph_(timon_and_pumbaa) (0) -> ralph_(timon_&_pumbaa) (2)
create implication eddie_(timon_&_pumbaa) (0) -> the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14)
create implication piper_(timon_&_pumbaa) (9) -> the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14)
create implication ralph_(timon_&_pumbaa) (2) -> the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14)
create implication pumbaa_jr. (1) -> the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14)
create implication princess_tatiana (2) -> the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14)

Reason: This was a TV show from 1995-1999 that has a good handful of characters that aren't seen in any other TLK media, so I figure it should have its own tag which implicates the_lion_king like the_lion_guard does, right?
Currently only a few T&P-exclusive characters have art posted here, but that could always change in the future.

Wikipedia) and IMDB call it Timon & Pumbaa but its full name is The Lion King's Timon & Pumbaa and that's what Disney+ calls it. I'm thinking the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa would be the better copyright tag name as it's more distinct from the character tags. Then the suffix would be (timon_&_pumbaa) since it's shorter.
Are ampersands (&) allowed in tag names though or would it need to be "and"? Please let me know if that needs to be changed

EDIT: The bulk update request #4973 (forum #367447) has been approved by @slyroon.

cloudpie said:
The bulk update request #4973 is active.

create alias timon_and_pumbaa (1) -> the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14)
create implication the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14) -> the_lion_king (10748)
create alias eddie_(timon_and_pumbaa) (1) -> eddie_(timon_&_pumbaa) (0)
create alias piper_(timon_and_pumbaa) (0) -> piper_(timon_&_pumbaa) (9)
create alias ralph_(timon_and_pumbaa) (0) -> ralph_(timon_&_pumbaa) (2)
create implication eddie_(timon_&_pumbaa) (0) -> the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14)
create implication piper_(timon_&_pumbaa) (9) -> the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14)
create implication ralph_(timon_&_pumbaa) (2) -> the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14)
create implication pumbaa_jr. (1) -> the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14)
create implication princess_tatiana (2) -> the_lion_king's_timon_&_pumbaa (14)

Are ampersands (&) allowed in tag names though or would it need to be "and"? Please let me know if that needs to be changed

While the system still allows for ampersands in tag names, the answer is officially no due to the technical issues they can cause. (Believe me, I don't like that fact either.) So, yes, they all need to be changed to "and".

alien_fluff said:
While the system still allows for ampersands in tag names, the answer is officially no due to the technical issues they can cause. (Believe me, I don't like that fact either.) So, yes, they all need to be changed to "and".

Done

Reverted to ampersands due to topic #39959

The ampersandless version, in case it's needed again:
alias timon_and_pumbaa -> the_lion_king's_timon_and_pumbaa
implicate the_lion_king's_timon_and_pumbaa -> the_lion_king
implicate eddie_(timon_and_pumbaa) -> the_lion_king's_timon_and_pumbaa
implicate piper_(timon_and_pumbaa) -> the_lion_king's_timon_and_pumbaa
implicate ralph_(timon_and_pumbaa) -> the_lion_king's_timon_and_pumbaa
implicate pumbaa_jr. -> the_lion_king's_timon_and_pumbaa
implicate princess_tatiana -> the_lion_king's_timon_and_pumbaa

The bulk update request #4973 (forum #367447) has been approved by @slyroon.