The bulk update request #5104 is pending approval.

create implication taur_upper_pregnancy (53) -> taur (18721)
create implication taur_upper_pregnancy (53) -> pregnant (41140)
create implication taur_lower_pregnancy (182) -> taur (18721)
create implication taur_lower_pregnancy (182) -> pregnant (41140)
create implication taur_double_pregnancy (46) -> taur_upper_pregnancy (53)
create implication taur_double_pregnancy (46) -> taur_lower_pregnancy (182)

Reason: taur_upper_pregnancy and taur_lower_pregnancy both involve a taur character who is pregnant.

As for taur_double_pregnancy, the tag applies when a taur character is pregnant in both their upper and lower halves. Those two halves are what “double” refers to in this context, and not the total number of pregnancies.

Should we have all of these imply pregnant_taur instead, perhaps, then have only that tag imply pregnant and taur?

scaliespe said:
Should we have all of these imply pregnant_taur instead, perhaps, then have only that tag imply pregnant and taur?

I guess that brings up a larger question of if the pregnant_[form] tags in general are worth keeping around. If so, then they’re currently all quite undertagged, and none of them have implications or wiki pages (yet).

I suppose they might not be too different from the [figure]_[form] tags or the [form]_[pred/prey] tags that we have. I’m curious what others think.