The tag implication #51331 human_focus -> not_furry_focus has been rejected.

Reason: if an image is tagged with human_focus then, as far as i can tell, not_furry_focus applies as well.

EDIT: The tag implication human_focus -> not_furry_focus (forum #369339) has been rejected by @themasterpotato.

post #2434969

a post with a human_focus isn't necessarily not_furry_focus, because not furry focus and not_furry are mutually exclusive tags; not furry focus means there are species considered furry in the image, whereas human focus merely states that a human needs to be the focus of the image. a human could be the focus of an image including humanoids or some other species considered not furry, but also not human and thus would be tagged not_furry. human_focus can either be tagged as not furry or as not furry focus, but a post can't have both tags since they contradict one another, which this implication could cause.

siral_exan said:
post #2434969

a post with a human_focus isn't necessarily not_furry_focus, because not furry focus and not_furry are mutually exclusive tags; not furry focus means there are species considered furry in the image, whereas human focus merely states that a human needs to be the focus of the image. a human could be the focus of an image including humanoids or some other species considered not furry, but also not human and thus would be tagged not_furry. human_focus can either be tagged as not furry or as not furry focus, but a post can't have both tags since they contradict one another, which this implication could cause.

I don't understand your point. The post you used either focuses on all characters at once which makes that human_focus is bad to use or it does focus on the human, but not the pikmins, so not_furry_focus and human_focus would go together.

wolfmanfur said:
I don't understand your point. The post you used either focuses on all characters at once which makes that human_focus is bad to use or it does focus on the human, but not the pikmins, so not_furry_focus and human_focus would go together.

the wiki pages for not_furry and not_furry_focus explain why they are mutually exclusive. the post i linked has pikmin and a human, neither of which are furry so the post gets tagged not_furry, and the human is the focus of the image so it gets tagged human_focus. all the *_focus tags require contradicting elements in them, not_furry_focus needs furry characters in them in order to be tagged, so a post containing only humans and humanoids would get tagged as not furry, because it has no furry characters in it.

wolfmanfur said:
I don't understand your point. The post you used either focuses on all characters at once which makes that human_focus is bad to use or it does focus on the human, but not the pikmins, so not_furry_focus and human_focus would go together.

not not_furry_focus only applies if there are furry characters in the post, pikmin aren't furry.

siral_exan said:
post #2434969

a post with a human_focus isn't necessarily not_furry_focus, because not furry focus and not_furry are mutually exclusive tags; not furry focus means there are species considered furry in the image, whereas human focus merely states that a human needs to be the focus of the image. a human could be the focus of an image including humanoids or some other species considered not furry, but also not human and thus would be tagged not_furry. human_focus can either be tagged as not furry or as not furry focus, but a post can't have both tags since they contradict one another, which this implication could cause.

You're absolutely correct, i completely missed the possibility for a post to be tagged with both human_focus and not_furry

The tag implication human_focus -> not_furry_focus (forum #369339) has been rejected by @themasterpotato.