News: Feb 26, 2025 Show

Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.

Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.

Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/

Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

Topic: vore and imminent_death

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

I've seen a few users tag imminent_death on posts with vore, but nothing else indicating death. See post #4089271, post #3333908, and post #4083782.
Is this correct? I don't personally think imminent_death should be applied unless digestion is actively shown or heavily implied, but I can also see how it could be considered the default. If it is correct, then there are a huge number of posts it should be added to.

I think Cow of Fire is using an e6 browser plugin or something.
First they edit tags to +imminent_death -soft_vore.
Then they add back +soft_vore immediately afterwards.
Repeated across several images, which is a little odd. If you're just going to re-add soft_vore why remove it in the first place?

Also, going by the letter of the wiki, yeah imminent_death is just "not dead yet, most likely will be soon", so vore -after_vore -endosoma -healing_vore -full_tour and vore imminent_death should be very similar (not quite identical) searches.

potentialgoat said:
I think Cow of Fire is using an e6 browser plugin or something.
First they edit tags to +imminent_death -soft_vore.
Then they add back +soft_vore immediately afterwards.
Repeated across several images, which is a little odd. If you're just going to re-add soft_vore why remove it in the first place?

Also, going by the letter of the wiki, yeah imminent_death is just "not dead yet, most likely will be soon", so vore -after_vore -endosoma -healing_vore -full_tour and vore imminent_death should be very similar (not quite identical) searches.

I am sorry. A few months ago, I didn't realize that the e621 definition of soft_vore has changed. I am (hopefully) tagging everything correctly now…

Over 18?

You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.

Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.