The tag alias #63302 agender -> genderless_(disambiguation) has been rejected.

Reason: there is no difference between the agender and genderless definition wise and mean the same thing
i’ve considered aliasing it nonbinary first but in some instances this was also used to refer the character as genderless/sexless without the nb label and some are canonically ambiguous as such

EDIT: The tag alias agender -> genderless_(disambiguation) (forum #369419) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Agender usually refers to a type of gender identity, or more specifically lack of thereof. Kind of like atheism as a religious position.
Probably should be aliased to agender_(lore), or however you make lore tags.

Agender_(lore), yeah. Which might imply nonbinary_(lore)?

waydence said:
Probably should be aliased to agender_(lore), or however you make lore tags.

I don't think we should be aliasing a somewhat ambiguously defined general tag to a lore tag. like, nonbinary isn't aliased to nonbinary_(lore), I feel like gender lore tags should be added with intent and not be potentially added to stuff by accident.

I wanted to set up a BUR to move agender, genderfluid and bigender to lore, but I'm getting "Antecedent name has already been taken", I assume because of this.

My proposed BUR:

alias agender -> agender_(lore)
alias genderfluid -> genderfluid_(lore)
alias gender_fluid -> genderfluid_(lore)
alias fluid_gender -> genderfluid_(lore)
alias bigender -> bigender_(lore)
category agender_(lore) -> lore
category genderfluid_(lore) -> lore
category bigender_(lore) -> lore

The above should be rejected, since nonbinary is aliased to nonbinary_(lore) so there's no reason not to do the same for agender.

The tag alias agender -> genderless_(disambiguation) (forum #369419) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.