Implicating lola_bunny → looney_tunes
Link to implication

Reason:

The most recent looney_tunes cartoons have her as a prominent character.

Just space_jam and warner_bros as the copyright doesn't cut it nowadays.

+1, also:

Unimplicate: lola_bunny -/> space_jam

Reason: lola_bunny has 415 posts, space_jam has 420. There are posts with the movie as a theme, but not all of them. I see little reason to keep that implication.

parasprite said:
+1, also:

Unimplicate: lola_bunny -/> space_jam

Reason: lola_bunny has 415 posts, space_jam has 420. There are posts with the movie as a theme, but not all of them. I see little reason to keep that implication.

Not just that, but there are about three other tags, that I've currently noticed, that don't have their copyright implicated.

I'll be adding those three momentarily.

I feel like I should point out that the character in Looney Toons is actually quite different.
Though the name is the same, and appearance is quite similar.

I suppose that's not sufficiently relevant to tagging though to warrant a separation.

Halite said:
I feel like I should point out that the character in Looney Toons is actually quite different.
Though the name is the same, and appearance is quite similar.

I suppose that's not sufficiently relevant to tagging though to warrant a separation.

No, not really.

That would be like making tags to alternate the same characters that appear in Teen Titans, in comparison to Teen Titans GO.

...Of course, there IS queen_chrysalis_(idw).