The bulk update request #5293 has been rejected.

remove implication zygarde (342) -> generation_6_pokemon (73874)
remove alias zygarde_50_forme (92) -> zygarde (342)
create implication zygarde_cell (25) -> generation_7_pokemon (50685)
create implication zygarde_cell (25) -> zygarde (342)
remove implication zygarde_cell (25) -> zygarde_core (75)
create implication zygarde_core (75) -> zygarde (342)
remove implication zygarde_core (75) -> legendary_pokemon (57986)
create implication zygarde_10_forme (161) -> zygarde (342)
remove implication zygarde_10_forme (161) -> legendary_pokemon (57986)
create implication zygarde_complete_forme (32) -> zygarde (342)
remove implication zygarde_complete_forme (32) -> legendary_pokemon (57986)

Reason: Zygarde 50% forme was introduced in generation 6
Zygarde cell, Zygarde core, Zygarde 10% forme and Zygarde complete forme were introduced in generation 7
Since Zygarde already implies legendary_pokemon, Zygarde cell, Zygarde core, Zygarde 10% forme and Zygarde complete forme won't need the implication

I couldn't create an implication for zygarde_50_forme to zygarde due to it already being aliased to that tag

create implication zygarde_50_forme -> zygarde

New 2024-03-26

EDIT: The bulk update request #5293 (forum #372142) has failed: Error: zygarde_cell already implies generation_7_pokemon through another implication (create implication zygarde_cell -> generation_7_pokemon)

EDIT: The bulk update request #5293 (forum #372142) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

By convention, we don't imply alternate forms of Pokémon to the base species, especially when the alternate forms are as different as the various Zygardes.

Also: topic #38207

wat8548 said:
By convention, we don't imply alternate forms of Pokémon to the base species, especially when the alternate forms are as different as the various Zygardes.

Also: topic #38207

Zygarde isn't a form in itself, like shaymin or lycanroc it's a collection of different species/forms: zygarde_cell, zygarde_core, zygarde_10_forme, zygarde_50_forme, and zygarde_complete_forme, which it must be one of.

wat8548 said:
By convention, we don't imply alternate forms of Pokémon to the base species, especially when the alternate forms are as different as the various Zygardes.

Also: topic #38207

I'm not really sure there is a "base form" of Zygarde. Sure, 50 core came first, but there's nothing known as just "Zygarde", after X and Y at least. it's always either 10 core, 50 core or complete forme. This would line up with how other Pokémon like deoxys or shellos are treated.

bump

bump

The bulk update request #5293 (forum #372142) has failed: Error: zygarde_cell already implies generation_7_pokemon through another implication (create implication zygarde_cell -> generation_7_pokemon)

The bulk update request #5293 (forum #372142) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.