https://e621.net/post/show/211783/alpha_channel-animated-butt-cream_the_rabbit-cub-f

if we can get a tag for it people can search for the small images similar to this that ive seen around the site.
I was considering "Icon_Size" or "Icon" maybe "Animated_Icon"
what do you guys/girls think?

icon_size sounds good. Though, I'd prefer lo_res, in contrast to hi_res

Edit: Searching for width:<=150 height:<=150 returns 132 posts and width:<=150 height:<=150 animated gives 147. That'll be quick to tag (if there's an agreement)

But these already exist:
width:100
height:100
you can already search a certain size with those...

Butterscotch said:
But these already exist:
width:100
height:100
you can already search a certain size with those...

true, but not every one knows that, we already have a few tags for size like huge_res (or whatever its called) ((insane_res? lol) this would be a tag devoted to the tiny animated icon like images.

or like what Xch3l offered, low_res sounds good.

But isn't easier to search smaller resolutions than those enormous like 7852x4979? (which is why hi_res or absurd_res exists)? also if it gets created what purpose would width and height still have if people would rather search for an approximate size without them :P

Butterscotch said:
But isn't easier to search smaller resolutions than those enormous like 7852x4979? (which is why hi_res or absurd_res exists)? also if it gets created what purpose would width and height still have if people would rather search for an approximate size without them :P

well i also just found out not all of them are 100x100 the low_res tag would allow any image under an admin set limit to be eligible for the tag, allowing for a much larger retrieval of images. its a pain in the ass to go width:100, then search width:101, then width:102, ect see what im getting at?

You could do width:<=150 height:<=150 (yay metatags!) to search images equal or smaller than 150px square (default thumbnail size) instead of going size by size

@Esme_Belles Yes I see your point, what I was just saying was that the other two could serve for a more exact result.

@Xch3l Like that.

well id like to see what the mods say too, but i do see now what people can do but its still going to be an unknown, just figured since we have a high_res tag we should also have a low_res one as well.