The tag implication #51574 bun_buns_(bun_buns) -> nonbinary_(lore) has been rejected.

Reason: post #4161817

EDIT: The tag implication bun_buns_(bun_buns) -> nonbinary_(lore) (forum #375007) has been rejected by @nigward.

With how the lore tags work, which is based on artist of the specific image and not based on the character owner,

characters should not implicate lore tags.

It's possible for an artist to depict a character differently, such as an alternate universe or "what if..." scenario where they're not nonbinary, making the lore tag inapplicable in those instances.

I guess you didn't get the hint last time.

Anyway, I've seen that exact type of character sheet before and if this implication was approved I'd put money on it being reversed and changed to trans_woman_(lore) within the next two years.

wat8548 said:
I guess you didn't get the hint last time.

Anyway, I've seen that exact type of character sheet before and if this implication was approved I'd put money on it being reversed and changed to trans_woman_(lore) within the next two years.

I unfortunately didn't read that until now, I don't get notifications for these sorts of posts, apologies.

The tag implication bun_buns_(bun_buns) -> nonbinary_(lore) (forum #375007) has been rejected by @nigward.