The tag implication #51792 adolescent_on_child -> age_difference has been rejected.

Reason: New implication suggestion

EDIT: The tag implication teenager_on_child -> age_difference (forum #375831) has been rejected by @slyroon.

While these makes sense and if you do one, you should do the others, the description is the reason only I have upvoted it, or voted on it at all, for that matter.

Oops, sorry, typo on the BUR - I meant a different pair of ages. Derp!

The bulk update request #5513 is pending approval.

create alias teenager_on_cub (0) -> adolescent_on_younger (0)
create implication adolescent_on_younger (0) -> age_difference (66291)
create implication adolescent_on_younger (0) -> adolescent (15757)
create implication adolescent_on_adolescent (623) -> young_on_young (9292)
create implication adult_on_adolescent (505) -> age_difference (66291)
create implication adult_on_adolescent (505) -> adult_on_young (11725)
create implication adult_on_child (1328) -> child (26837)
create implication adult_on_child (1328) -> age_difference (66291)
create implication adult_on_baby (691) -> baby (5238)
create implication adult_on_baby (691) -> age_difference (66291)
create implication adult_on_toddler (66) -> toddler (2838)
create implication adult_on_baby (691) -> age_difference (66291)
create alias cub_on_adult (0) -> adult_on_young (11725)

Reason: Adding the other ones starting with teenager and cub. Will add the other age_difference group tags as I find them.
Note that cub -> young is already an implication.
There is no way for age_difference to be implied by young_on_young so the chain is broken, and thus both have to be implied.
Similar logic applies for any other permutation.

topic #32774 Teenager_on_teenager already implies teenager.
topic #33613 adult_on_cub -> cub
Tag implication adult_on_cub -> age_difference (topic #38726 is hidden - uh oh...)
https://e621.net/meta_searches/tags?name=adult_on_cub&commit=Go In fact, all adult_on_cub implications are pending/done. Ooooooookay then.
https://e621.net/meta_searches/tags?name=child_on_child&commit=Go child/young_on_young already implied (and thus young)

Topics are hidden by the creator, they can do it for whatever reason. Usually the staff lock instead of hide the whole topic.

Check the mod actions They're mostly users hiding their own instead of staff.

snpthecat said:
Topics are hidden by the creator, they can do it for whatever reason. Usually the staff lock instead of hide the whole topic.

Check the mod actions They're mostly users hiding their own instead of staff.

Ah, OK. Well, the older_on_* tags are for a different BUR, so best separate them.

The bulk update request #5514 is pending approval.

create implication older_on_loli (68) -> loli (30786)
create implication older_on_shota (65) -> shota (36786)
create implication older_on_toddler (8) -> toddler (2838)
create implication older_on_toddler (8) -> age_difference (66291)
create implication older_on_young (2584) -> young (236137)
create implication older_on_young (2584) -> age_difference (66291)
create implication older_on_baby (28) -> baby (5238)
create implication older_on_baby (28) -> age_difference (66291)
create alias older_on_cub (2) -> older_on_young (2584)
create implication older_on_child (96) -> child (26837)
create implication older_on_child (96) -> age_difference (66291)

Reason: Here's the 2nd age_differences BUR for tonight. It should continue where BUR #5513 left off. Now with the older_* tags instead of the explicitly teen/adult/whatever_on* tags.
Note that older is not the same as adult, because say teenagers are older than children, for tagging purposes.
https://e621.net/meta_searches/tags?name=young&commit=Go You'll notice that many of those already are implying young.

alphamule said:
create implication teenager_on_cub (7) -> young_on_young (6874)
create implication teenager_on_cub (7) -> age_difference (56710)
create implication teenager_on_cub (7) -> teenager (12747)
create implication teenager_on_cub (7) -> cub (137918)
...
create implication older_on_cub (1262) -> cub (137918)
create implication older_on_cub (1262) -> age_difference (56710)

These should be aliased to their x_on_young counterparts, IMO. Cub is specifically only for feral, anthro, and taur characters, excluding human, humanoid, and other, which makes it much more specific than simply an age group. It would be like tagging teenager_on_humanoid_child or human_on_anthro_child.

watsit said:
These should be aliased to their x_on_young counterparts, IMO. Cub is specifically only for feral, anthro, and taur characters, excluding human, humanoid, and other, which makes it much more specific than simply an age group. It would be like tagging teenager_on_humanoid_child or human_on_anthro_child.

Hmm, then I'd have to make sure that all of them have cub tag. OK, fixed.
teenager_on_cub -set:cub_apocalypse
teenager_on_cub -teenager
teenager_on_cub -age_difference
older_on_cub -set:cub_apocalypse Only 1 result (post #3514445) which had incorrect tag because he's human, thus not cub.

Only messy thing is teenager_on_young technically includes teenager_on_teenager but only a fool would tag it that way, right? RIGHT? :P

alias teenager_on_cub -> teenager_on_young
implicate teenager_on_young -> teenager
implicate teenager_on_young -> young
implicate teenager_on_young -> age_difference

Would this make sense?

alphamule said:
create implication teenager_on_young (0) -> age_difference (56728)

I suppose it depends on how this tag should be used, but technically teenager is young. teenager_on_teenager would technically be teenager_on_young, making it not always age_difference. Unless it's intended to be more like teenager_on_younger, i.e. child, toddler, or baby, which would be valid.

alphamule said:
create implication teenager_on_young (0) -> teenager (12749)
create implication teenager_on_young (0) -> young (221775)

The second is redundant since teenager already implies young.

watsit said:
I suppose it depends on how this tag should be used, but technically teenager is young. teenager_on_teenager would technically be teenager_on_young, making it not always age_difference. Unless it's intended to be more like teenager_on_younger, i.e. child, toddler, or baby, which would be valid.

The second is redundant since teenager already implies young.

Yeah, manually updated/tagged them, so removing that. If someone uses it in future, they'll hopefully notice it got aliased.
Also, that alias makes more sense. Teenager_on_younger it is! Cub shouldn't be alias because young already covers the default blacklist, and likely they'll tag it cub and explicit, anyways.

Also removed cub_on_adult, and manually retagged with "adult_on_young cub -cub_on_adult -adult_on_cub" copy and paste. The alias was changed to cub, to be consistent with the 6-part BUR.

It's kind of hilarious/ridiculous that when tagging stuff like this, I've already seen most of the images, or already tagged them with another project. I've turned myself into the age_difference expert, LOL.

Oh joy, another tag I just discovered: male/cub This is literally the same thing as male_on_cub. Is it legit?

https://e621.net/forum_topics/41779?page=1#forum_post_384004 Yo, this is obsolete. Gonna need to edit or reject these.
Old version of BUR 5513

Old version of BUR 5514

The bulk update request #5513 is pending approval.

create alias teenager_on_cub (0) -> adolescent_on_younger (0)
create implication adolescent_on_younger (0) -> age_difference (66291)
create implication adolescent_on_younger (0) -> adolescent (15757)
create implication adolescent_on_adolescent (623) -> young_on_young (9292)
create implication adult_on_adolescent (505) -> age_difference (66291)
create implication adult_on_adolescent (505) -> adult_on_young (11725)
create implication adult_on_child (1328) -> child (26837)
create implication adult_on_child (1328) -> age_difference (66291)
create implication adult_on_baby (691) -> baby (5238)
create implication adult_on_baby (691) -> age_difference (66291)
create implication adult_on_toddler (66) -> toddler (2838)
create implication adult_on_baby (691) -> age_difference (66291)
create alias cub_on_adult (0) -> adult_on_young (11725)

The bulk update request #5514 is pending approval.

create implication older_on_loli (68) -> loli (30786)
create implication older_on_shota (65) -> shota (36786)
create implication older_on_toddler (8) -> toddler (2838)
create implication older_on_toddler (8) -> age_difference (66291)
create implication older_on_young (2584) -> young (236137)
create implication older_on_young (2584) -> age_difference (66291)
create implication older_on_baby (28) -> baby (5238)
create implication older_on_baby (28) -> age_difference (66291)
create alias older_on_cub (2) -> older_on_young (2584)
create implication older_on_child (96) -> child (26837)
create implication older_on_child (96) -> age_difference (66291)

Removed: implicate adult_on_adolescent -> adolescent # duplicate of implication #53154
Also, adolescent_on_adolescent -> adolescent is in another BUR, already.

The tag implication teenager_on_child -> age_difference (forum #375831) has been rejected by @slyroon.