Topic: [REJECTED] Tag alias: fetal_movement -> unborn_kicking

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

m3g4p0n1 said:
What if the picture only consists of the inside of the pregnant character, showing only the unborn without showing the outside, would that tag still be applicable?

Ooh... I actually don't know tbh. Good question

recursion said:
The tag alias #63922 fetal_movement -> unborn_kicking has been rejected.

Reason: Fetal_movement is a redundant tag. The explanation on the wiki page for unborn_kicking shows that it should already cover any situations where you'd need to use a fetal_movement tag.

EDIT: The tag alias fetal_movement -> unborn_kicking (forum #376212) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Huh, I wonder what's with the opposition to the alias. They definitely seem pretty similar.

snpthecat said:
Huh, I wonder what's with the opposition to the alias. They definitely seem pretty similar.

Probably liking one term over another if I had to guess? Some feedback on top of a down vote would be much more useful but what are you gonna do. They seem like basically interchangeable tags to me.

To be honest I think it should be reversed. The second one for example would not apply if image depicts an unborn child clearly pressing their hand against stomach for example, but it's still essentially same thing that people look up or blacklist for same reasons. Fetal movement in other hand would cover both.

  • 1