?
Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.
Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.
Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/
Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!
Posted under Art Talk
?
E621 is an art archive. Furaffinity is... I honestly don't know what they're trying to do with that site anymore. It's mostly used for art, yes.
For that specific community, yeah.
But also ppl use twitter a lot for furry art. Also I see itaku is starting to get used more often after FA rule changes https://itaku.ee/home/images?ordering=-date_added
In general, yeah. FurAffinity is a vast collection of galleries with each user managing their own gallery, if they so choose to upload. E621 is a community-sourced, highly-searchable image/video site (a "booru"). Both sites are furry-focused.
FA allows users to upload things like photos with no apparent furry content. E621 has much stricter content requirements and staff manually approve every upload for site relevance. We do allow "not furry" content (146K uses so far) that has only characters without animal anatomy while still not being human, like robots and plant people. Gardevoir's base design has no animal traits but is still not human, so gardevoir's base design is "not furry." FA allows artists to advertise sketch YCHes and open commissions whereas E621 would delete such posts (and warn the uploader) if those posts are low quality.
E621 is more art-focused than FA, and FA is more community-focused than E621. Both sites have a Discord. FA gives uploaders a lot more control over their content. E621 is worlds better at organizing and finding content because uploaders don't have absolute control over their uploads' tags.
Keep in mind in terms of user demographics that E621 is an 18+ site, whereas FA sets the registration minimum at 13, with no lower quality limit on what can be uploaded. Beyond the... obvious concerns, this also means most of what's uploaded to FA is absolute trash and a nightmare to pick through due to the lack of any blacklisting functionality. God forbid you load the main page, ever.
do ppl actually use fa
meaterbeater431 said:
do ppl actually use fa
Many must. I see tons of new posts all the time. I don't know if it's anywhere near Twitter's millions, though. It's far more focused.
votp said:
Beyond the... obvious concerns, this also means most of what's uploaded to FA is absolute trash and a nightmare to pick through due to the lack of any blacklisting functionality. God forbid you load the main page, ever.
So much this, it continuously baffles me that FA has no blacklist. Even a "questionable" filter like e6 has would be great, so itd at least be possible to filter out the front page without needing a whole unaffiliated extension -m-
You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.
Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.