Currently the tags for Fang the Sniper, Bark the Polar Bear, and Bean the Dynamite are all implicated to Sonic the Fighters. However none of these characters are exclusive to this game and in Fang's case, it's not even the title he debuted in. Honey the Cat is the only one that hasn't shown up in any other games, not counting the comics.

The bulk update request #5558 is active.

remove implication fang_the_sniper (0) -> sonic_the_fighters (777)
remove implication bean_the_dynamite (66) -> sonic_the_fighters (777)
remove implication bark_the_polar_bear (95) -> sonic_the_fighters (777)

Reason: I don't know these characters, but I'll take Fluffykemos's word for it.

EDIT: The bulk update request #5558 (forum #376634) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

crocogator said:
The bulk update request #5558 is active.

remove implication fang_the_sniper (0) -> sonic_the_fighters (777)
remove implication bean_the_dynamite (66) -> sonic_the_fighters (777)
remove implication bark_the_polar_bear (95) -> sonic_the_fighters (777)

Reason: I don't know these characters, but I'll take Fluffykemos's word for it.

Should re-add an implication to sonic_the_hedgehog_(series), no?

Again, I'm against characters being implicated to single-installment media.
It has the inherent problem of invalidating the implication if that character ever appears in a later-series installment within the same canon-verse. I get that it's useful for people to be able to search specifically for a franchise's New Thing but it creates an ever-growing treadmill of tag associations that need to be reworked every single time a sequel comes out with stuff from The Last New Thing in it.

wat8548 said:
Should re-add an implication to sonic_the_hedgehog_(series), no?

Good catch, I didn't notice that. Due to limitations with BURs, the above unimplications have to go through first before this separate BUR can be created:

crocogator said:
Good catch, I didn't notice that. Due to limitations with BURs, the above unimplications have to go through first before this separate BUR can be created:

imply fang_the_sniper -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) imply bean_the_dynamite -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) imply bark_the_polar_bear -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series)

I don't think they do. That restriction only applies to aliases. The site won't stop you from creating redundant implications - many such implications already exist.

wat8548 said:
I don't think they do. That restriction only applies to aliases. The site won't stop you from creating redundant implications - many such implications already exist.

Huh, I was under the impression that it did in some cases

Yeah that's what I suspected.

wat8548 said:
I don't think they do. That restriction only applies to aliases. The site won't stop you from creating redundant implications - many such implications already exist.

you can't implicate tags that are already implied through another tag implication

The bulk update request #5558 (forum #376634) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #5654 is active.

create implication fang_the_hunter (436) -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) (114130)
create implication bean_the_dynamite (66) -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) (114130)
create implication bark_the_polar_bear (95) -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) (114130)

Reason: Adding implication back to the franchise

EDIT: The bulk update request #5654 (forum #378736) has been approved by @slyroon.

snpthecat said:
The bulk update request #5654 is active.

create implication fang_the_hunter (436) -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) (114130)
create implication bean_the_dynamite (66) -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) (114130)
create implication bark_the_polar_bear (95) -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) (114130)

Reason: Adding implication back to the franchise

probably make a new thread for this.

The bulk update request #5654 (forum #378736) has been approved by @slyroon.