Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: demongirl_demoness -> ai_generated

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Looking at their artwork I'm 99% sure that this isn't true, and seems more like some smear campaign you're orchestrating by yourself.

Even if this was true, an implication like this will never be made due to the fact an AI artist can make art that isn't AI (causing the art to be mistagged as such) and AI art should be deleted anyway, so there's no point having implications for an empty artist tag.

faucet said:
Looking at their artwork I'm 99% sure that this isn't true, and seems more like some smear campaign you're orchestrating by yourself.

Looking at their own comments they admit to us[ing] an AI generated image as a reference, though I find it a curious choice to fully redraw some parts of the image but stay as faithful as possible to the fucked up hands.

Either way this isn't what tag implications are for.

I really hope that the Mess lajag67319 did to DD's Artworks can be undone! Makes me really sad that something like this happen to one of my favorite Artists

yetanothertemp said:
?

Artist made a comment about using an alt to upload since their main hit the limit.

The limit is there to reduce spam, but since it is an artist uploading their own work, I don't see it as such a bad thing.

deadoon said:
Artist made a comment about using an alt to upload since their main hit the limit.

The limit is there to reduce spam, but since it is an artist uploading their own work, I don't see it as such a bad thing.

Ah, thanks

  • 1