There are some female tags I think need to be cleaned up a bit. Originally I was going to make a BUR for some of these but... if you couldn't tell by my avatar, I don't look at much content with females, So I don't think I'm the right one to clean up female tags. That said, I am bringing them up they can be cleaned up after being discussed by those do look for content with females.

Tags in Question

• alpha_female
• anthro_fingering_female
• anthro_rimming_female
• female_facesitting_female
• female_fisting_female
• herm_rimming_female
• human_fingering_female
• human_penetratin_female
• human_rimming_female
• insidelarger_female
• larger_t_female
• maletofemale
• maned_female
• subfemale

Tags that might be too specific

• animal_humanoid_penetrating_female
• bisexual_female
• brown_skinned_female
• completely_nude_female
• confident_female
• duo_female
• elf_female
• fat_female
• goblin_female
• headless_female
• horny_mature_female
• hourglass_figured_female
• latina_female
• micro_female
• morbidly_obest_female
• mostly_offscreen_female
• muscular_and_chubby_female
• naked_female
• pale_skinned_female
• passive_female
• scantily_clad_female
• short_smaller_female
• slightly_muscular_female
• sonic-oc-female
• ugly_female

female_fisting/fisting_female both don't exist, but if they did, it would have made sense to use those, I guess. AFAIK, we only tag fisting,female/female, and their implications.
Hmm, insidelarger_female is a typo for inside,larger_female.
Larger_t_female -> It's already tagged trans_woman (lore).
Obviously, maletofemale should be aliased to mtf since the latter is the official tag.

The bisexual_female tag only contained one post, so I removed it. I think a "bisexual_(lore)" tag would be cool.

dimoretpinel said:
The bisexual_female tag only contained one post, so I removed it. I think a "bisexual_(lore)" tag would be cool.

post #4202710
This one? The bisexual tag is because of there being a penis between them... they probably meant to add two tags (typo).

bisexual_male Highly doubt that many was by accident, though. :)
bisexual_male -male/bisexual_male -bisexual <-- Made sure the implications made sense. Going to go through and verify if it's actually bisexual.
bisexual_male -male -female Apparently, this covered all cases.

Here 's an example where it should probably not be tagged bisexual, nor female/female since you can't tell with Susie. Just as an example of (in)valid use. There's tons of tags like this where more than half of those 16 pages should have it but don't.