Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions
I mean:
1- He's green (in some not at all,but still) as orcs, which are allowed in the site.
2-He has his own humanoid species named "Gerudo"
I ask about it because some solo posts i Uploaded about him got deleted by counting as human only:
https://e621.net/posts/4359946
https://e621.net/posts/4359914
https://e621.net/posts/4359965
Lore information is not considered, purely twys. For the most part, he has no non-human traits, and gets treated as a human. Skin color is generally not a consideration.
I can't see the exact images that got deleted, but they might actually have group value with their parents that could justify undeletion. For example, this is a sequence and deleting the "human only" parts is deleting part of the sequence.
vulpes_artifex said:
Some of his forms have pointy ears like Hylians.
Yeah, once you add the pointy ears it's acceptable.
It's not about who the character is, but what they look like. It doesn't matter whether it's solo Ganondorf, or Link, or Zelda, or Revali, or Kass, or Sidon, or whoever else; it depends on whether they look human in a given image. Sometimes Ganondorf is portrayed as human, just with greenish or some other color skin, which can be deleted if there's no other relevant character visible. Sometimes he's portrayed with slightly pointy ears, which lets him stay.
My first two deletions ever were for the same character and reason, so this policy has been in place for at least four years.
faucet said:
Yeah, once you add the pointy ears it's acceptable.
How about this one?
https://e621.net/posts/4338422?q=ganondorf+-humanoid_pointy_ears
It has no humanoid pointy ears and still has been acepted as non human
faucet said:
Yeah, once you add the pointy ears it's acceptable.
How about this one?
https://e621.net/posts/4338422?q=ganondorf+-humanoid_pointy_ears
He has no pointy ears in this one and still is accepted.
nanomecho said:
How about this one?
https://e621.net/posts/4338422?q=ganondorf+-humanoid_pointy_ears
It has no humanoid pointy ears and still has been acepted as non human
it's tangentially relevant, since it's a part of a greater whole of images, all combined into one post. e6 allows things like (but not limited to) the separate parts of a TF sequence, so long as it's made apparent that they're related (often by parent/child posting or pools), or if they're part of some comic or series of images that end up being relevant...
mind you, this doesn't mean a 100 page comic with 99 posts being human only, will be allowed just because of the 1 post that has a bunny rabbit barely within the pic; extreme human focus posts can be deleted due to the overwhelming amount of irrelevance. gaming the system will likely result in the posts getting deleted regardless of relevance, as would incredibly minor edits to a previously-deleted post to try and make it relevant.
siral_exan said:
it's tangentially relevant, since it's a part of a greater whole of images, all combined into one post. e6 allows things like (but not limited to) the separate parts of a TF sequence, so long as it's made apparent that they're related (often by parent/child posting or pools), or if they're part of some comic or series of images that end up being relevant...
ehhh... that usually applies more to a series or sequences, in order to not have the flow of a comic broken or to give context to another image. I'm not sure if the example post should be an exeption, it's not giving needed context to a relevant post, or anything, it's just a human hangin out on his own.
personally I'd lean more to it being approved in error rather than it actually passing as a relevant human_only post.
sipothac said:
ehhh... that usually applies more to a series or sequences, in order to not have the flow of a comic broken or to give context to another image. I'm not sure if the example post should be an exeption, it's not giving needed context to a relevant post, or anything, it's just a human hangin out on his own.personally I'd lean more to it being approved in error rather than it actually passing as a relevant human_only post.
*editing it to better phrase*
what's really a matter of dispute is whether this could be considered a series of images, and whether collections are sufficient. it's constantly repeated that series and pools are allowed, but pools include "collections" which don't have as much from-to relevance for their posts. if this flew under the radar, it might be because it was seen as a series when a more proper decision needs to be made. otherwise, it seems to me like this would be OK since it's part of an otherwise greatly relevant group of posts.
Updated
if ganon has pointy ears he's good
he's allowed because he's technically a nonhuman and this site allows humans with slightly modified features, like elves or anime characters with cat ears he's hot and i want to see porn of him
Updated
wwwwwwwww said:
he's allowed becausehe's technically a nonhuman and this site allows humans with slightly modified features, like elves or anime characters with cat earshe's hot and i want to see porn of him
You just read my mind in both senses...
faucet said:
Yeah, once you add the pointy ears it's acceptable.
What about the often green skin? And a prominent nose is something that some versions of gerudo have
grey_scale_dragon said:
What about the often green skin? And a prominent nose is something that some versions of gerudo have
skin color doesn't matter for relevance if it did we'd have to allow The Simpsons characters and any other of the mountains of technicolor humans from other cartoons.
sipothac said:
skin color doesn't matter for relevance if it did we'd have to allow The Simpsons characters and any other of the mountains of technicolor humans from other cartoons.
Fair enough
