The tag implication #52067 cum_inflation -> cum_inside has been approved.

Reason: A character being inflated with cum necessarily needs it to enter the body (though making an edge case would be an entertaining exercise.) Both are semi-popular tags and having the implication would help with completeness.

EDIT: The tag implication cum_inflation -> cum_inside (forum #379702) has been approved by @slyroon.

looseygoosey said:
The tag implication #52067 cum_inflation -> cum_inside has been approved.

Reason: A character being inflated with cum necessarily needs it to enter the body (though making an edge case would be an entertaining exercise.) Both are semi-popular tags and having the implication would help with completeness.

cum inside

Depictions of cum within an orifice such as a pussy, anus, mouth, etc. Often evident from semen leaking from the orifice, or seen in internal view.

One problem is vore, so they're already inside (the stomach), so it wouldn't be cum inside but it can be cum inflation

Okay, so it seems like the cum_inside tag works off of an orifice being used. This would also mean entryways not connected to the character's outside (like a portal opening directly into someone's stomach or someone filling a ghost by indiscriminately jamming a dick into its side and phasing it in) also wouldn't count, interesting. Maybe there's a potential to suggest a broader tag but that would be clutter.

snpthecat said:
One problem is vore, so they're already inside (the stomach), so it wouldn't be cum inside but it can be cum inflation

this feels like this should still be considered cum_inside, it's supposed to refer to where the cum is, regardless of where it comes from. all of the cum_from_* tags imply their respective cum_in_* tags which in turn imply cum_inside.

sipothac said:
this feels like this should still be considered cum_inside, it's supposed to refer to where the cum is, regardless of where it comes from. all of the cum_from_* tags imply their respective cum_in_* tags which in turn imply cum_inside.

If that's what the tag is meant to be, then yeah the implication is valid

The tag implication cum_inflation -> cum_inside (forum #379702) has been approved by @slyroon.

The tag implication cum_inflation -> cum_inside (forum #379702) has been approved by @slyroon.