So sorry if I'm talking about SAI, but... I promise this will be the last... for now...
Updated by user 22273
Posted under Art Talk
So sorry if I'm talking about SAI, but... I promise this will be the last... for now...
Updated by user 22273
Uhm, you don't?
It's based on pixels.
Updated by anonymous
Yeah, I don't think it's possible
It's kiiiinda possible in Photoshop though.
Updated by anonymous
You can "kind of" vector on SAI with the linetool, but other than that it's not possible on SAI
Updated by anonymous
Neitsuke said:
You can "kind of" vector on SAI with the linetool, but other than that it's not possible on SAI
Tokaido said:
Yeah, I don't think it's possible
See:
https://static1.e621.net/data/4d/15/4d15a003be811858bd78b5b22067072f.png
or
https://static1.e621.net/data/d1/3f/d13f3d2c2fe73b72a045e53eb04ac6be.png
Updated by anonymous
paint tool sai does not support vectors. but the closest thing to vectors is the lineart tool.
Updated by anonymous
If you're just talking about extremely hi-res pieces that can then be shrunk and plugged into other art: Create a massive canvas, make the piece, save.
If you're talking about making an actual vector file: SAI ain't the tool you're looking for.
Updated by anonymous
Do something
Close it without saving... or save if you took your time for that (or if you follow guides step by step)
Get, install and open Inkscape and draw there
Done.
On Inkscape
Find your file
On the next small dialog pick "Link" and click OK (you can choose "Embed" but it'll take a bit more time, besides, we'll be deleting it later)
If the image is too big you can only see a portion of it (usually the center) or too small you can't see shit, press \[3] to fit the view to screen or \[*] to go back. \[#] never does anything, so you shouldn't touch it In Inkscape, pressing \[Shift] + \[3] (#) will toggle the grid
Select the image (if it's not) and click on "Path" and then "Trace bitmap" (or press \[Shift] + \[Alt] + \)
Play a bit with the options, clicking "Preview" every now and then and then on "OK" when finished
Finally, remove the base image and tweak the vectorized one as needed
You don't have to actually do this, though :3
Updated by anonymous
Cutedementia said:
See:
https://static1.e621.net/data/4d/15/4d15a003be811858bd78b5b22067072f.png
or
https://static1.e621.net/data/d1/3f/d13f3d2c2fe73b72a045e53eb04ac6be.png
Hehe, no, if those were made in SAI or Photoshop those aren't vectors. They might have been created with the line tool, which is itself a vector tool, but doesn't actually create vector images. You can think of vector tools like the line or pen tool as kind of a template, or stencil. The stencil is a vector line, meaning you can zoom in indefinitely and the line never loses resolution. Problem is that when you paint in the stencil these programs can only paint with pixels, which DO have a finite resolution. That's because SAI (and Photoshop) render bitmap images instead of vector ones, so they can never truly create vector images .... though Photoshop CAN render polygons/3D images, but that's a whole nother discussion.
But, like Nyteshade said, if you want something that's close to vector images from these programs, you can just create them at ridiculously large resolutions, and you'll never be able to tell the difference.
Updated by anonymous
The way I see it, if a program can save as an SVG (scalable vector graphics), then it's a vector program. If it does not, then it is not. Sai can't, even though it has a vector tool. If you need a true vector program you could use Inkscape or Serif Drawplus which can save files as SVG.
Updated by anonymous
Does LInework count. If not, then what other purpose it has?
Updated by anonymous
Ponynstuff320 said:
Does LInework count. If not, then what other purpose it has?
Complex selections or lines. But those selection and lines are still bitmaps, not vectors.
Updated by anonymous
Ponynstuff320 said:
Does LInework count. If not, then what other purpose it has?
The Linework tool is a vector tool, but Sai can't export said vectors.
Updated by anonymous
What is the best vector program to use instead?
Updated by anonymous
I use Serif Drawplus, but you might prefer Inkscape.
Updated by anonymous
Vectoring in general, at least for serious drawings, is not a good idea. The lines can't be dynamic as it can be on SAI with the linetool and even if lines look smooth no matter how big it is, I find the auto antialiasing pretty bad with vectors.
You should try to use the linetool on SAI instead and work with that. If you really have that need for vectors, Krita has a vector brush you can use
Updated by anonymous
Does it work best to put layer underneath Linework for filling the colors?
Mutisija said:
paint tool sai does not support vectors. but the closest thing to vectors is the lineart tool.
Updated by anonymous
Ponynstuff320 said:
Does it work best to put layer underneath Linework for filling the colors?
There are other ways to do it (I know a lot of artists use masking, but I never got the hang of it), but this is essentially how I do it usually.
I don't know what SAI calls it, but in Pixelmator you can save time by using the wand tool to select only parts of Layer A, then switch to Layer B to color it in in; it works kind of like a half-assed temporary mask. Alternatively you can select everything outside of an object, invert selection, and then switch layers, but it really depends on what you're trying to do.
Updated by anonymous
parasprite said:
There are other ways to do it (I know a lot of artists use masking, but I never got the hang of it), but this is essentially how I do it usually.I don't know what SAI calls it, but in Pixelmator you can save time by using the wand tool to select only parts of Layer A, then switch to Layer B to color it in in; it works kind of like a half-assed temporary mask. Alternatively you can select everything outside of an object, invert selection, and then switch layers, but it really depends on what you're trying to do.
Atryl does that. IIRC, haven't been on his streams in a while, he uses wand tool to select on the lineart layer and then "Increase selection" 3-5 times. Then, on another layer, he does the coloring. Same for shading and lighting.
I'm not sure where is that option, but maybe fiddling on the menubar you can find it. Guess it's on the second-to-last menu
Updated by anonymous
Xch3l said:
Atryl does that. IIRC, haven't been on his streams in a while, he uses wand tool to select on the lineart layer and then "Increase selection" 3-5 times. Then, on another layer, he does the coloring. Same for shading and lighting.I'm not sure where is that option, but maybe fiddling on the menubar you can find it. Guess it's on the second-to-last menu
Neat. I found a similar option for Pixelmator under "Refine selection". I had no idea that was there, thanks.
Updated by anonymous
parasprite said:
Neat. I found a similar option for Pixelmator under "Refine selection". I had no idea that was there, thanks.
Do I need to shade underneath the layers? Or on the linework? Or what other strategic way?
Updated by anonymous
Ponynstuff320 said:
Do I need to shade underneath the layers? Or on the linework? Or what other strategic way?
A simplified method:
Top layer: Linework
Middle layer: Shading
Bottom layer: Color - If you do the shading here instead, it's sometimes easier to use the burn/dodge tool in place of a regular brush
Try it out, see if it works for you. It may take a little bit of getting used to, but eventually you're likely to develop your own personal workflow different from this.
Updated by anonymous
Parasprite's advice is not wrong, but of course different workflows are suitable for different styles.
For example:
Also, this isn't doable in SAI alone, but after using it, I feel obligated to recommend GMIC's interactive lineart coloring tool (. David Revoy has a very good tutorial explaining it here . It is so much better for getting the color areas laid out basically correct than the traditional manual painting bullshit, that I kind of wonder how I didn't shoot myself before when coloring.
Updated by anonymous
Ponynstuff320 said:
Do I need to shade underneath the layers? Or on the linework? Or what other strategic way?
depends on which you like more
Updated by anonymous