The bulk update request #5918 has been rejected.

create implication stylized_beady_eyes (1) -> beady_eyes (4688)
create implication stylized_beady_eyes (1) -> stylized_eyes (117)
create implication stylized_empty_eyes (222) -> stylized_eyes (117)
create implication stylized_eyes (117) -> stylized (396)
create alias text_in_eyes (10) -> text_on_eyes (8)
create alias robot_eyes (16) -> robotic_eyes (8)
create alias dark_red_eyes (1) -> red_eyes (257814)
create alias stars_eyes (7) -> starry_eyes (502)
create implication 12_eyes (3) -> many_eyes (0)
create implication 16_eyes (2) -> many_eyes (0)
create implication 6_eyes (794) -> many_eyes (0)
change category reupload (0) -> invalid

Reason on these BUR (exact order):
1. Images with beady eyes should be tagged with beady_eyes
2. Whatever uses the tag stylized_beady_eyes should also be tagged with stylized_eyes, because it's a tag meant for images with unrealistic eyes.
3. stylized_empty_eyes is a tag for unrealistic empty eyes.
4. The reason for this BUR is exactly because of what the name of the suggested imply for stylized is.
5. text_in_eyes is a smaller tag and needs to alias into a bigger tag.
6. Same with the previous one. A smaller duplicate tag should alias a bigger tag.
7. light_pink_body is pink body. Now, how about this BUR?
8. Same with the 5th and 6th one.
9. many_eyes is when there's a large amount of eyes.
10. Same with the previous one.
11. Same with the previous one.
12. Now for the last and additional one on this BUR topic is the category change of reupload request. faucet told me that this tag should be in the "invalid" category instead.

I spent so many hours on writing the reason but don't ask me why lol

EDIT: The bulk update request #5918 (forum #382666) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

What is "stylized eyes", or even "stylized"? That seems ripe for misuse since anything that's not hyper realistic can be described as "stylized". Beady eyes and empty eyes themselves can be called "stylized".

watsit said:
What is "stylized eyes", or even "stylized"? That seems ripe for misuse since anything that's not hyper realistic can be described as "stylized". Beady eyes and empty eyes themselves can be called "stylized".

I know right. I see images with unrealistic head and realistic body structure. Empty eyes can look realistic or unrealistic, it's just a plain-colored eye.

The bulk update request #5918 (forum #382666) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Do we want to keep the many eyes tag and imbue it with an implication tree? could be useful as an umbrella tag covering a number of eyes > [value] Oh that's multi_eye

The bulk update request #7272 is active.

create alias many_eyes (0) -> multi_eye (21318)

Reason: Same meaning

EDIT: The bulk update request #7272 (forum #397562) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #7272 (forum #397562) has been approved by @slyroon.