Topic: [REJECTED] Age Group Implications BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #6009 has been rejected.

create implication adult_on_young (12016) -> age_difference (67530)
create implication adult_on_teenager (9) -> adult_on_young (12016)
create implication adult_on_child (1415) -> adult_on_young (12016)
create implication adult_on_toddler (76) -> adult_on_young (12016)
create implication adult_on_baby (696) -> adult_on_young (12016)
create implication teenager_on_teenager (4) -> young_on_young (9570)
create implication teenager_on_child (3) -> young_on_young (9570)
create implication teenager_on_child (3) -> age_difference (67530)
create implication teenager_on_toddler (0) -> young_on_young (9570)
create implication teenager_on_toddler (0) -> age_difference (67530)
create implication teenager_on_baby (0) -> young_on_young (9570)
create implication teenager_on_baby (0) -> age_difference (67530)
create implication child_on_child (995) -> young_on_young (9570)
create implication child_on_toddler (9) -> young_on_young (9570)
create implication child_on_toddler (9) -> age_difference (67530)
create implication child_on_baby (8) -> young_on_young (9570)
create implication child_on_baby (8) -> age_difference (67530)
create implication toddler_on_toddler (4) -> young_on_young (9570)
create implication toddler_on_baby (0) -> young_on_young (9570)
create implication toddler_on_baby (0) -> age_difference (67530)
create implication baby_on_baby (3) -> young_on_young (9570)

Reason: All of these should be self-explanatory. Figured I'd get this in while we're on the subject of young characters.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6009 (forum #383719) has been rejected by @pleaseletmein.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #6010 has been rejected.

create implication adult_on_teenager (9) -> teenager (0)
create implication adult_on_child (1415) -> child (27208)
create implication adult_on_toddler (76) -> toddler (2883)
create implication adult_on_baby (696) -> baby (5443)
create implication teenager_on_child (3) -> teenager (0)
create implication teenager_on_child (3) -> child (27208)
create implication teenager_on_toddler (0) -> teenager (0)
create implication teenager_on_toddler (0) -> toddler (2883)
create implication teenager_on_baby (0) -> teenager (0)
create implication teenager_on_baby (0) -> baby (5443)
create implication child_on_toddler (9) -> child (27208)
create implication child_on_toddler (9) -> toddler (2883)
create implication child_on_baby (8) -> child (27208)
create implication child_on_baby (8) -> baby (5443)
create implication toddler_on_toddler (4) -> toddler (2883)
create implication toddler_on_baby (0) -> toddler (2883)
create implication toddler_on_baby (0) -> baby (5443)
create implication baby_on_baby (3) -> baby (5443)

Reason: Part II

('teenager_on_teenager -> teenager' and 'child_on_child -> child' already exist)

EDIT: The bulk update request #6010 (forum #383720) has been rejected by @pleaseletmein.

Updated by auto moderator

sipothac said:
I think maybe we should have baby/toddler/child/teenager_on_young similar to how we have like gynomorph/intersex. so like, teenager_on_teenager -> teenager_on_young -> young_on_young implication chain.

what utility would that provide?

pleaseletmein said:
what utility would that provide?

uhh, it'd help to finding age_difference posts within the young age groups so like teenager_on_young age_difference should provide any posts with a teenaged character and any character of a younger age group, and it'd be slightly easier to use than with than teenager_on_baby teenager_on_toddler teenager_on_child

sipothac said:
uhh, it'd help to finding age_difference posts within the young age groups so like teenager_on_young age_difference should provide any posts with a teenaged character and any character of a younger age group.

young_on_young age_difference teenager would accomplish the same thing.

I generally have a positive opinnion on this, but I think we should resplit child and teenager into child (3–10), then something like tweenager (10–14), and then teenager(14–17/20). With the current child, there's a huge difference between a 4 year old and a 12 year old. Also 13 year old "teenager" is very different from 16 year old.

urielfrys said:
I generally have a positive opinnion on this, but I think we should resplit child and teenager into child (3–10), then something like tweenager (10–14), and then teenager(14–17/20). With the current child, there's a huge difference between a 4 year old and a 12 year old. Also 13 year old "teenager" is very different from 16 year old.

Well, given that it's hard enough to tell ages as it is... Not likely to happen. Cub aging is about as imprecise as it gets, also.

  • 1