The bulk update request #6021 is active.

create implication gootraxian (211) -> kaiju_paradise (251)

Reason: Gootraxians are a species from the game kaiju paradise.
See:
- Fandom official wiki page: https://kaiju-paradise-official-wiki.fandom.com/wiki/Gootraxians
- Fandom fanmade wiki page: https://kaiju-paradise-fanmade.fandom.com/wiki/Gootraxians
- Some youtube video: https://youtu.be/FlayCXKlK4Y?si=kU-l4wO7iNExt41V

They are also goo creatures, but I do not know if this should also be implied or not
There are also multiple types (subspecies?) of gootraxians, which will be in a BUR.

EDIT: The tag alias gootraxian -> kaiju_paradise (forum #383769) has been rejected by @DimoretPinel.

The bulk update request #6012 is active.

create implication kaiju_gootraxian (1) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication catte_gootraxian (0) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication fed_gootraxian (2) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication figs_gootraxian (1) -> gootraxtian (1)
create implication glubby_gootraxian (2) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication hazzy_gootraxian (0) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication mocha_gootraxian (0) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication plantix_gootraxian (1) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication shork_gootraxian (0) -> gootraxian (211)

Reason: They are all gootraxian subspecies

EDIT: The bulk update request #6012 (forum #383770) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #6013 is active.

create alias ghost_fox_(kaiju_paradise) (2) -> ghostfox_gootraxian (44)
create alias ghost_fox_gootraxian (0) -> ghostfox_gootraxian (44)
create implication ghostfox_gootraxian (44) -> gootraxian (211)

Reason: The ghostfox gootraxian is not a character, it’s a species; there are multiples of them.

Fandom fanmade wiki page: https://kaiju-paradise-fanmade.fandom.com/wiki/Ghost_Fox

EDIT: The bulk update request #6013 (forum #383771) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #6014 is active.

create alias panther_(kaiju_paradise) (5) -> panther_gootraxian (21)
create implication panther_gootraxian (21) -> gootraxian (211)

Reason: Same reason as ghostfox

EDIT: The bulk update request #6014 (forum #383772) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #6015 is active.

create alias nightcrawler_(kaiju_paradise) (2) -> nightcrawler_gootraxian (44)
create alias night_crawler_(kaiju_paradise) (0) -> nightcrawler_gootraxian (44)
create alias night_crawler_gootraxian (0) -> nightcrawler_gootraxian (44)
create implication nightcrawler_gootraxian (44) -> gootraxian (211)

Reason: Same reason as ghostfox and panther

EDIT: The bulk update request #6015 (forum #383775) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

was it supposed to be implication?

snake-girl said:
was it supposed to be implication?

oh oops
yeah, the very first alias was supposed to be an implication

edit: fixed

The tag alias gootraxian -> kaiju_paradise (forum #383769) has been rejected by @DimoretPinel.

The bulk update request #6021 is active.

create implication gootraxian (211) -> kaiju_paradise (251)

Reason: fixing mistake

EDIT: The bulk update request #6021 (forum #383887) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #6021 (forum #383887) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #6012 (forum #383770) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #6013 (forum #383771) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #6014 (forum #383772) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #6015 (forum #383775) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

dimoretpinel said:
The bulk update request #6012 is active.

create implication kaiju_gootraxian (1) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication catte_gootraxian (0) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication fed_gootraxian (2) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication figs_gootraxian (1) -> gootraxtian (1)
create implication glubby_gootraxian (2) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication hazzy_gootraxian (0) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication mocha_gootraxian (0) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication plantix_gootraxian (1) -> gootraxian (211)
create implication shork_gootraxian (0) -> gootraxian (211)

Reason: They are all gootraxian subspecies

EDIT: The bulk update request #6012 (forum #383770) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

Why are we giving implications for tags with 0 posts