The tag implication #53168 femboy -> male/male has been rejected.

Reason: Girly/girly should implicate male/male

EDIT: The tag implication girly/girly -> male/male (forum #384281) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Should be an alias, girly isn't a distinct gender tag so shouldn't have pairings.

This would be a good implication if the girly tag wasn’t currently contested (see topic #38587 and topic #40593).

Maybe we can keep this suggestion on the side of the stove for now.

dimoretpinel said:
This would be a good implication if the girly tag wasn’t currently contested (see topic #38587 and topic #40593).

Maybe we can keep this suggestion on the side of the stove for now.

Oh! I had no idea it was contested. Thanks for the response and the links.

Regardless of the tag itself being allowed or not, girly applies to male, andromorph, and maleherm characters - neither an implication nor alias (to male/male) will cover that usage

donovan_dmc said:
Regardless of the tag itself being allowed or not, girly applies to male, andromorph, and maleherm characters - neither an implication nor alias (to male/male) will cover that usage

Best to alias girly/girly to girly I suppose?

The tag implication girly/girly -> male/male (forum #384281) has been rejected by @slyroon.