Why is no_climax Invalid? it fixed an issue with animations, uploaders often didn't add the orgasm tag, they do however remember to use no_climax tag. Unless someone can find a way to make sure the orgasm tag gets used, this is bringing back an old issue that was solved with this one tag.

waller said:
Why is no_climax Invalid? it fixed an issue with animations, uploaders often didn't add the orgasm tag, they do however remember to use no_climax tag. Unless someone can find a way to make sure the orgasm tag gets used, this is bringing back an old issue that was solved with this one tag.

Making another tag that won't be tagged properly won't solve the problem of a tag not being tagged properly, it creates more missing tags (as no_climax will also inevitably end up missing from many posts without a climax) and increases tag bloat since every post has to be one or the other. If you see orgasm missing from posts, the best thing to do is add it.

Generally speaking tagging the lack of something is almost always bad because people look for what is in the post, rather than what isn't (that's what negation is for).

There are a substantial less amount of posts that apply to orgasm than those that would apply for no_climax, simply because not every explicit post contains an orgasm... So just don't tag it if that's the case, or do tag it if it exists.

Even if orgasm is absent, in my experience cum is usually very thoroughly tagged. It's not the kind of detail even sloppy uploaders think not worth mentioning.