The tag implication #53612 music_video -> webm has been rejected.

Reason: With music video already having "video" in the title, I feel it makes sense for the tag to have webm as an implication. It's already only used on webms (aside from old flash animations, which aren't uploaded as flash files anymore), and if the tag were used on an image there would be no way to tell if the video in said image was a music video or not anyways.

EDIT: The tag implication music_video -> webm (forum #388055) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Flash files are still available, and playable. Some of them would be falsely tagged as webm. Furthermore, there is the possibility that we could add other video formats in the future. So that gets a big no from me.

webm files are automatically tagged with webm upon upload so even in a best case scenario this would be pointless, and worst case it would be incorrect per DubsTheFox's reasonings.

The tag implication music_video -> webm (forum #388055) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.