Topic: [APPROVED] bg3 implications

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #6309 is active.

create implication astarion_(baldur's_gate) (202) -> baldur's_gate_3 (1152)
create implication gale_(baldur's_gate) (39) -> baldur's_gate_3 (1152)
create implication karlach (186) -> baldur's_gate_3 (1152)
create implication lae'zel (78) -> baldur's_gate_3 (1152)
mass update shadowheart -> shadowheart_(baldur's_gate)
create implication shadowheart_(baldur's_gate) (133) -> baldur's_gate_3 (1152)
create implication the_dark_urge_(baldur's_gate) (336) -> baldur's_gate_3 (1152)
create implication wyll_(baldur's_gate) (24) -> baldur's_gate_3 (1152)

Reason: Game-specific implications for the main baldur's_gate_3 characters.
Change shadowheart to shadowheart_(baldur's_gate) because it's a generic name, even if she is the only one the tag refers to.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6309 (forum #388085) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

  • 1