The bulk update request #6360 has been rejected.

create alias eikthydeer (0) -> eikthyrdeer (5)
remove implication eikthydeer (0) -> pal_(species) (4497)

Reason: Accidentally forgot an "r" in Eikythrdeer while tagging a while back and that typo got implications with the approval of bulk update request #6242 (topic #42069). Requesting this to remove the implication and alias the typo to the correct spelling.

See bulk update request #6336 (topic #42267) by theghost123 for create implication eikthyrdeer -> pal_(species) and other needed implications.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6360 (forum #388936) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

slocheze said:
The bulk update request #6360 has been rejected.

create alias eikthydeer (0) -> eikthyrdeer (5)
remove implication eikthydeer (0) -> pal_(species) (4497)

Reason: Accidentally forgot an "r" in Eikythrdeer while tagging a while back and that typo got implications with the approval of bulk update request #6242 (topic #42069). Requesting this to remove the implication and alias the typo to the correct spelling.

See bulk update request #6336 (topic #42267) by theghost123 for create implication eikthyrdeer -> pal_(species) and other needed implications.

The topic #42267 link is broken, it only works without the square brackets.

slocheze said:
The bulk update request #6360 has been rejected.

create alias eikthydeer (0) -> eikthyrdeer (5)
remove implication eikthydeer (0) -> pal_(species) (4497)

Reason: Accidentally forgot an "r" in Eikythrdeer while tagging a while back and that typo got implications with the approval of bulk update request #6242 (topic #42069). Requesting this to remove the implication and alias the typo to the correct spelling.

See bulk update request #6336 (topic #42267) by theghost123 for create implication eikthyrdeer -> pal_(species) and other needed implications.

If you did this as an alias and not a bur, the implications would've carried over.

topic #42335

This can be rejected now that the implication was removed and aliased to eikthyrdeer.

theghost123 said:
This can be rejected now that the implication was removed and aliased to eikthyrdeer.

You should be able to reject it yourself

kyiiel said:
You should be able to reject it yourself

I can't because it's not my BUR.

theghost123 said:
I can't because it's not my BUR.

Indeed, I am stupid

The bulk update request #6360 (forum #388936) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.