Implicating alvin_seville → alvin_and_the_chipmunks
Link to implication
Related implications:
- alvin_seville -> alvin_and_the_chipmunks (OP approved)
- theodore_seville -> alvin_and_the_chipmunks (approved)
- simon_seville -> alvin_and_the_chipmunks (approved)
While I question the point of the tag, eleanor_miller, jeanette_miller, and brittany_miller currently imply chipettes, however I'm not entirely convinced that we need it.
Option 1:
- Unimplicate: eleanor_miller -/> chipettes (deleted)
- Unimplicate: jeanette_miller -/> chipettes (deleted)
- Unimplicate: brittany_miller -/> chipettes (deleted)
- eleanor_miller -> alvin_and_the_chipmunks (approved)
- jeanette_miller -> alvin_and_the_chipmunks (approved)
- brittany_miller -> alvin_and_the_chipmunks (approved)
And to make wiping the tag simpler, possibly....
- Alias: chipettes -> alvin_and_the_chipmunks (approved)
Option 2:
Updated