The bulk update request #7068 is pending approval.

create alias chained_up (714) -> chained (8043)
create alias metal_chain (147) -> chain (35723)
create implication chain_bracelet (33) -> chain_jewelry (772)
create implication wrist_chains (5) -> chain_accessory (253)
create implication chain_jewelry (772) -> chain (35723)
create implication chain_jewelry (772) -> jewelry (246209)
create implication chain_accessory (253) -> chain (35723) # duplicate of implication #64781
create implication chain_accessory (253) -> accessory (145402) # duplicate of implication #64782
create implication chain_collar (446) -> chain (35723)
create implication chain_necklace (1650) -> chain_jewelry (772)

Reason: If I'm not mistaken, chained up is just a way to say chained that's used less. Chained also already implicates chain. Metal chain feels redundant to me since basically every chain I've ever seen is metal. Both necklaces and bracelets are a form of jewelry according to the jewelry wiki page. I make the distinction between wrist chains and chain bracelet because to me, wrist chains are one or more lengths of chain wrapped somewhat loosely around the wrist while a chain bracelet is a single chain that neatly links together around the wrist. See posts 4650293 and 4204498 for respective examples. Alternatively we could just combine them under chain bracelet, but I figured I'd put out my suggestion. All of the rest are fairly self explanatory. If this does get accepted, the chain wiki page will need to be updated to match

I agree with:

create alias chained_up -> chained
create alias metal_chain -> chain

The implications on the other hand I do not agree with. They are either incomplete or they do not make sense to me. Examples:

• Incomplete: chain_jewelry should imply chain but not jewelry?
• Incomplete: chain_accessory should imply chain but not accessory?
• Doesn't make sense: chain_leash should imply chain_accessory even though it is not something that one usually wears as an accessory? (A lot of chain_leash tags are going to wrongly imply chain_accessory because of this.)
• Would only make sense if leash also implies accessory, which it doesn't right now. I wouldn't say it qualifies as a clothing accessory. It's more like an accessory to an accessory.

create alias chained_up (514) -> chained (6997)
create alias metal_chain (126) -> chain (32246)
create implication chain_jewelry (659) -> chain (32246)
create implication chain_accessory (180) -> chain (32246)

Hell ye to these

create implication chain_collar (405) -> chain_accessory (180)
create implication chain_leash (3074) -> chain_accessory (180)

nah to these. Leash/collar aren't accessories on e6, so we should stay consistent.

create implication wrist_chains (4) -> chain_accesory (0)

Spelled accessory wrong, otherwise yeah

remove implication chain_necklace (1081) -> chain (32246) # missing
create implication chain_necklace (1081) -> chain_jewelry (659)

eh... This might get put big steel interlocking chains under "Jewelry" and that's not correct. Don't like it.
EDIT: Like this post: post #4587940 This ain't jewelry, that's just a big ol chain.

Should add

• chain_jewelry implies jewelry
• chain_accessory implies accessory

like Muon said.

Fix all that, and I think you got a dunker.

cowboyjones said:
Hell ye to these

nah to these. Leash/collar aren't accessories on e6, so we should stay consistent.

Spelled accessory wrong, otherwise yeah

eh... This might get put big steel interlocking chains under "Jewelry" and that's not correct. Don't like it.
EDIT: Like this post: post #4587940 This ain't jewelry, that's just a big ol chain.

Should add

• chain_jewelry implies jewelry
• chain_accessory implies accessory

like Muon said.

Fix all that, and I think you got a dunker.

That image is mistagged. There's no necklace there at all.

cowboyjones said:
Hell ye to these

nah to these. Leash/collar aren't accessories on e6, so we should stay consistent.

Spelled accessory wrong, otherwise yeah

eh... This might get put big steel interlocking chains under "Jewelry" and that's not correct. Don't like it.
EDIT: Like this post: post #4587940 This ain't jewelry, that's just a big ol chain.

Should add

• chain_jewelry implies jewelry
• chain_accessory implies accessory

like Muon said.

Fix all that, and I think you got a dunker.

Alright, fixed. Thanks to both of you for the feedback on this, it really helped refine it.