The bulk update request #7116 is pending approval.

create alias in-laws (9) -> in-laws_(lore) (0)
create alias in_laws (0) -> in-laws_(lore) (0)
create alias in-law (9) -> in-laws_(lore) (0)
create alias in_law (0) -> in-laws_(lore) (0)
remove alias daughter_inlaw (0) -> daughter-in-law (94)
remove alias daughter_in_law (0) -> daughter-in-law (94)
remove alias mother_inlaw (0) -> mother-in-law (87)
remove alias mother_in_law (0) -> mother-in-law (87)

Reason: This is a big BUR to set up and move in-laws to lore. This is gonna take a couple BURs so this one is just the absolute basics. Aliasing the most general tag to lore and removing transitives.

Currently there's a lot of in-laws mistagged as stepfamily.

The BUR overall should set in-laws up like the other family related tag groups:

• in-laws_(lore)
• parent-in-law_(lore)
• mother-in-law_(lore)
• father-in-law_(lore)
• daughter-in-law_(lore)
• son-in-law_(lore)
• sibling-in-law_(lore)
• brother-in-law_(lore)
• sister-in-law_(lore)

As well as the relationship tags:

• parent-in-law_and_child-in-law_(lore)
• mother-in-law_and_child-in-law_(lore), father-in-law_and_child-in-law_(lore)
• parent-in-law_and_son-in-law_(lore), parent-in-law_and_daughter-in-law_(lore)
• mother-in-law_and_daughter-in-law_(lore), mother-in-law_and_son-in-law_(lore), father-in-law_and_daughter-in-law_(lore), father-in-law_and_son-in-law_(lore)
• brothers-in-law_(lore), sisters-in-law_(lore), brother-in-law_and_sister-in-law_(lore)

I still think this tree format is unnecessarily clunky but like I mentioned in my missing adopted tags thread, this is the way the biological and stepfamily tags are set up, so I'm just matching them. ¯\(ツ)/¯

If someone wants to propose simplifying these implication chains then I'm glad to edit my BUR.