Implicating ponytail → hair
Link to implication

Reason:

From the wiki:

A ponytail is a hairstyle...

Most hairstyles require the presence of hair.

Yeah this ones good, approved. :)

parasprite said:
Yeah this ones good, approved. :)

but what if theres a character with idk like tentacles or feathers for hair and then the tentacles or feathers are tied on ponytail?

Mutisija said:
but what if theres a character with idk like tentacles or feathers for hair and then the tentacles or feathers are tied on ponytail?

Like this post #79033

edidaf said:
Like this post #79033

yeah. that def shouldnt have hair tag.
this implication is bad and should be deleted.

edidaf said:
Like this post #79033

I'm not saying that the implication shouldn't be deleted, but I think it's worth mentioning that that post was already tagged with hair.

Implication is now deleted.

Alright, I had a quick through the posts (mostly ones without mammal) and it looks like the damage caused by this was pretty minimal as it almost worked but for a few that it didn't work for. There is probably going to be a few left over that are on the borderline between hair and not hair, but at least now they can be corrected now that the implication is gone.

It just goes to show that even something that seems completely obvious like this one can turn out to have not-so-obvious unintended consequences. Thanks to Mutisija and edidaf for bringing this up and providing counter-examples.