The tag implication #58951 larger_on_top -> on_top has been approved.

Reason: Is in the name

EDIT: The tag implication larger_on_top -> on_top (forum #396581) has been approved by @slyroon.

I don't like on_top and on_bottom since they have functionally identical meanings as tags lol. But I haven't been able to think of a good name to combine them to. Top_and_bottom's the best i've got but idk if it's good enough.

Just noticed there's also on_top_of which implies on_top instead of aliasing to it...

The bulk update request #7174 is active.

remove implication on_top_of (1791) -> on_top (111183)

Reason: this implication was made in 2016 with no discussion, was it a mistake maybe? https://e621.net/tag_implications/8132
these are clearly synonyms

After:
alias on_top_of -> on_top

EDIT: The bulk update request #7174 (forum #396584) has been approved by @slyroon.

Perhaps on_top/on_top_of should be renamed to on_another or on_top_of_another, to make it clear it's about one character on another. on_bottom should be aliased as well, since it's functionally identical; for a character to be on the bottom, one must be on top, and vice-versa.

The bulk update request #7174 (forum #396584) has been approved by @slyroon.

The tag implication larger_on_top -> on_top (forum #396581) has been approved by @slyroon.

watsit said:
Perhaps on_top/on_top_of should be renamed to on_another or on_top_of_another, to make it clear it's about one character on another. on_bottom should be aliased as well, since it's functionally identical; for a character to be on the bottom, one must be on top, and vice-versa.

Great idea