The bulk update request #7178 is active.

remove implication bandaid_protagonist_(tas) (256) -> tokyo_afterschool_summoners (26134)
remove implication chubby_protagonist_(tas) (677) -> tokyo_afterschool_summoners (26134)
remove implication female_protagonist_(tas) (361) -> tokyo_afterschool_summoners (26134)
remove implication jock_protagonist_(tas) (215) -> tokyo_afterschool_summoners (26134)
remove implication twink_protagonist_(tas) (460) -> tokyo_afterschool_summoners (26134)

Reason: Unimply the tags to imply them to the protagonist_(tas) tag.

If these are alternate forms of a sort, wouldn't it be better to keep them separate? E.g. link_(wolf_form) doesn't imply link

strikerman said:
If these are alternate forms of a sort, wouldn't it be better to keep them separate? E.g. link_(wolf_form) doesn't imply link

protagonist_(tas) is an umbrella tag for the 5 protagonists.

strikerman said:
If these are alternate forms of a sort, wouldn't it be better to keep them separate? E.g. link_(wolf_form) doesn't imply link

I don't know the game, but from the sound of it it's more of a shaymin situation than a link situation. There isn't just a shaymin on it's own, something can't be just "a shaymin", they would have to be sky_forme_shaymin or land_forme_shaymin (or something based on the forms).

theghost123 said:
protagonist_(tas) is an umbrella tag for the 5 protagonists.

watsit said:
I don't know the game, but from the sound of it it's more of a shaymin situation than a link situation. There isn't just a shaymin on it's own, something can't be just "a shaymin", they would have to be sky_forme_shaymin or land_forme_shaymin (or something based on the forms).

Ah, fair enough then

The bulk update request #7178 (forum #396608) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #7200 is active.

create implication bandaid_protagonist_(tas) (256) -> protagonist_(tas) (2006)
create implication chubby_protagonist_(tas) (677) -> protagonist_(tas) (2006)
create implication female_protagonist_(tas) (361) -> protagonist_(tas) (2006)
create implication jock_protagonist_(tas) (215) -> protagonist_(tas) (2006)
create implication twink_protagonist_(tas) (460) -> protagonist_(tas) (2006)

Reason: Followup of the BUR above.

EDIT: The bulk update request #7200 (forum #396893) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #7200 (forum #396893) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.