The tag implication #60080 cloacal_penis -> cloaca has been rejected.

Reason: It's a penis coming out of a cloaca. I was honestly surprised to see this hadn't been done before as far as I could tell.

EDIT: The tag implication cloacal_penis -> cloaca (forum #397050) has been rejected by @spe.

Nope. You can see the penis and infer it's cloacal from the lack of anus without seeing the cloaca itself. The lack of anus is usually more important for confirming that a character has a cloaca than seeing the entire genital structure itself.

post #803590

Also, we have a long-standing rule in genital_slit to assume that the correct of cloaca vs genital_slit applies to the sensible ferals, even without seeing the anus. By extension, we can infer that such a feral having an appropriate visible penis is a cloacal penis without seeing the cloaca. That is perhaps too forward-thinking for... everyone, and may be too far removed from the idea of a cloaca to be worth doing.

The tag implication cloacal_penis -> cloaca (forum #397050) has been rejected by @spe.